Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some issues
Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 04 August 2016 12:40 UTC
Return-Path: <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E985012D182 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LulnBte4SIFN for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25EA12B049 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id q83so270417640iod.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=652jlqjHpcNU3v8tWsYnDqshWTgl1nbUykl2ZfFHjQI=; b=mqLlgGCEx27R0uHEyHv2wjbtHRqHOFLIKYxEKK88c5KYlOiAJLgs+HA6Mp8q1wgXLm /qzl71vCrTrjHXibd39+Urgf7+qImA7O9ZmUcHwN4sTMC5Ub8viO+sDttFWe2gVbWdLA YJih6XwnvrFkM1IaO+xvO4IRxwFzXuGqW0kIayGRrvLTx55Slk7aSK+NGS4PFpPVGmNw kTBHEM89JizULO7KFI2UP/73uma4Rn3eO3Qbksi1C/soFn/c7jaUw+4wtzyEw6YQiKiE s5HnARA9UE1S3XJ2cT01anw4x18OgA3VuqKqVA+2vB+mW8k7HRPe+fZWs/nYTLsr08Bs 4qtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=652jlqjHpcNU3v8tWsYnDqshWTgl1nbUykl2ZfFHjQI=; b=QhrKz1IT5tHXwjq6Lrub1NBa3Alm68CK1nlherPZRNV+Hu/VbW9ifIsS4jMWPC3PlK MqGd29ky2U8ku/ERSW8/yHnLjn+oPDsnG8jwExQXsssbi/sIUbDPMOO/Rh2vogpOzpN0 S6fTHifKidv2p3H3Hp4r2FHRGJrf7QTKzGLDUNzPbK3AJaEch2ogzr0l/++X9ZmXJZ/B VBT2k05wD4MKNogsWoiyY7mLFS1O9Cyhau4ctHKGMAxuy8ryzp3RnUyvl4DWe98jdWHL zVHtB6znLUFEURTdgc3TXs6NCHZu/CRDfRog+WG67kAKhY5ODgllw5mRc4iDOwWa4k4p jnbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutbEgWkCgDkX3OIxoclwIVdJFtODavrBuVyWOYN1HWgA9a8LGDaPuqUuJ60HYBt0YRY6ljMu+a+PmmewA==
X-Received: by 10.107.55.70 with SMTP id e67mr74479701ioa.51.1470314417124; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 05:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.0.26 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <cf9cb590-1c11-ce0a-07ad-274221db3999@alvestrand.no>
References: <cf9cb590-1c11-ce0a-07ad-274221db3999@alvestrand.no>
From: Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:40:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAB7PXwTCRdkUE1ptj48x2wghGvHX9hszB1yAkjCRjo0XEmX04A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a6d768a7a5505393e408e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/r85KopBD1MyutF4m3TRluskuNKo>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some issues
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 12:40:29 -0000
Harald, I don't think that #42 is really a technical change can you explain why why you think it is? The referencing of -return- was mentioned in te AD evaluation by Alissa see https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg15943.html Andy On Thursday, 4 August 2016, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > I have submitted -15 and closed those issues that I believe it resolves. > There are six left in the tracker: One I forgot (#40), one raised today > in the IESG (#41), and Andy's "RETURN reference" issue (#42), as well as > 3 issues where I suggested "no change" as a resolution. > > Comments welcome! > > Note - I believe #41 and #42 are technical changes, so should formally > require IESG re-processing. I believe the others are editorial in > nature, so can be done without a new IESG pass. > > Harald > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org <javascript:;> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Andy Hutton
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Alissa Cooper
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Alissa Cooper
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Alissa Cooper
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some … Andy Hutton
- [rtcweb] Transport -15 submitted, still some issu… Harald Alvestrand