Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 20 April 2015 19:40 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D6F1A86DD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YFz1GOI2MY4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D7A1A702B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=36556 helo=[192.168.0.18]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1YkHYe-0001IP-5z for rtcweb@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:40:40 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <6D8CC46E-1A9F-4C2E-B133-D2040B0D78DE@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:40:36 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10EE2D8D-2EBF-4B11-B20E-133F52937CE2@csperkins.org>
References: <6D8CC46E-1A9F-4C2E-B133-D2040B0D78DE@cisco.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: -28
X-Mythic-Debug: Threshold = On =
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/udqpYbMi94tl_DGFC9POXhvZzpY>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:40:44 -0000
On 16 Apr 2015, at 19:27, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote: > This starts a working group last call for: > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07 > > Please review them in detail. The chairs will send a separate email with some comments from us and others that can be considered part of the WGLC comments. Two quick comments: - Section 3 says "Clients MAY use the offer/answer mechanism to signal a preference for a particular mode or ptime". Is this just of Opus, or in general? It might be worthwhile saying something explicit about acceptable ptime values in general. - Security considerations ought to explicitly point to the security considerations of RFCs 3389, 4733, 6716, and draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus. It should possibly also point to the draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-11, and the security considerations for RTP use in WebRTC in draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-22 In general though, I think this draft is in good shape, and support publication. -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/
- [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07 Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07 Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-07 Colin Perkins