Re: [rtcweb] DRAFT minutes for RTCWEB day two

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2013 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266CC21F8E48 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mnw5ElHRqcRO for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F4921F8DBB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id at1so1885700iec.41 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BmzDxNmPJBvfDtdMzPkwoPGYeCiqqfHSTbAvXLf2Ayo=; b=r9khHdLoTIVBfesqRGRi5lILLTKWNyw6tketJzHLQt9fV1mVOiq6hnTrAvv6hMc6WG ohQ3/Q24BXEvqYRhMTrqMSnFMLhwrKF2agOHC5OjJv73T5nlAbFrtgbF1+LPus+K04rD uxPP7OwwABP5MHz2cIhToU1FKPSOhAtkiDmWTB1zf6AFcnVlAh7b2yvhBm8EGu/7CJSb XYRH0nM+jvl7bo6SUSGHhEyHFKTQvC6DYe6cXzJ1iHWy7a1ioOUD1YfRnMKcv/uhmv2M lj0OupUXr4t/X/HWnL1FJnngpIXJ0eaumNh6nS9CkF0nL4Bh4freFU9h7CIC3yz30BhL uZkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.27.10 with SMTP id p10mr302301igg.20.1365006503006; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.135.202 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134492D8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBho1Gmj_GfPorL+Q5B2wih9RDs+dNFDBdkfGT-MN6FVA@mail.gmail.com> <51562335.1020409@acm.org> <CA+9kkMAmZKCZZM4SEx4iFvi_VjccL=CUZLxzXpVHsmti603RDw@mail.gmail.com> <515AA036.2020008@ericsson.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134492D8@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:28:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDXfpkeQ_2kjtqTVrH2xFYk+M_6WLsakpdzw02w1zqByQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10cd29baba3104d97757e1
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DRAFT minutes for RTCWEB day two
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:28:34 -0000

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote;wrote:

>
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
> magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> > WG,
> >
> > Attached is a version with change marks for a number of proposed changes
> > where I think the minutes can benefit from clarification and details.
> >
> > I have one question mark where I don't understand what the minutes
> > reefer to. In Cullen's video presentation the following sentence exist:
> >
> > Henning’s guideline on this was the guideline from the beginning.
>
>
Henning's guideline is approximately "the point of mandatory to implement
anything is to avoid negotiation failure".


> Did anyone actually say that in the meeting? Was it Ted because I don't
> recall saying that.
>
>
Yes, as the minutes note, I said it at the floor mic during our discussion
of whether we should test  the MTI as proposed or treat the MTI as a
guideline on what approach would be commonly implemented and test at some
other level.

Ted