Re: [rtcweb] Syntax issues in draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 04 December 2017 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F73128D69 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:55:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqr8oNBLatHQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7259A120724 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vB4NtHG4050257 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:55:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp@tools.ietf.org>
References: <92b7b153-754a-0237-ad0a-6ec08c40e262@nostrum.com> <3530F649-EED5-4F27-BADA-3EF9011A6AAB@iii.ca> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C0377F6@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <b37b3cdb-57ec-8c0a-3ba8-aec10221393b@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:55:12 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C0377F6@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/w6HpTU_uxW5sKVNTWh3LojbcZx0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Syntax issues in draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:55:25 -0000

Christer --

I filed mine at <https://github.com/fluffy/ietf/issues>, which I hope is 
the right location.

/a

On 12/3/17 12:04, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Do you have the link to the GitHub repo?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: 03 December 2017 17:25
> To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
> Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Syntax issues in draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp
>
> That's great thank you. Could you please create issues in github (and only need one for fingerprint is broken, not every occurrence of it).
>
>
>> On Dec 1, 2017, at 8:47 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>> [as an individual]
>>
>> I wrote a script that extracts the SDP from the XML source of draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-08 and does some very basic syntax checks on it. I'm posting the results here as feedback on the document to assist in correcting the examples. Note that I have *not* performed any semantic verification of the SDP itself, only the syntax.
>>
>> Total error count: 152