[rtcweb] Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 August 2017 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCEE129B35 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bdu9eKIfS5Re for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346C3126B6E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id u139so35556719qka.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+v9w4wwzAwe2/iiudqV7wFlzIcHyWTmkGLz9fTju2LE=; b=XJ8+QrSTPyIr3PYl0niVZV3xuiXCVVpY9hRS1wxeKh/wj/7TYkGbUFLjG+Qdninl3v X9JhvSLyJtgA+BkFVlabQ9nIwFB414IQtuawLtrPbmgNMLKXhhIsNx5D31Kkkab288ux U5KK5x+iuzAbfxf9yLl7hUJ8YuqwOAGGGZBD8wfde/fVEX5sKWaTgbf9G/NoLDMVH75d s+5VpkMtpmzcCbsFYF8u+AfKZrSRLa2SM2cc3uFJ/3eZTZxaEQTL0gfJZ4CKF/AX9VAT 7yrhSVP03udzkD0UoeEvR0k81RPUUxpZHWZEVlRhAiaal76h8LtwyOpu9z5dE8s7/XBl XyRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+v9w4wwzAwe2/iiudqV7wFlzIcHyWTmkGLz9fTju2LE=; b=eKeaGd2R9Vv1oLm/0nL7Fraq8ww+vbfDuhDJaYRusujpgB4tykumUQ9tbIEt7m7azt lTc0cWY62dJkpOhCHp87SZDpg6DZ26rqdwHupXnjfMJKkNk5+S7Ddm82MynRmBS5VBgo /mKJ48OFg9R0FJKvHbGsCyFmMYav6vPl/bg4QPApJS8RA2QEC6ALyEYbsU5JW/j/Nq/8 AUsX2MCsqyaG33kj7IXinpj/MuMjrf7mgPyPVB2eHT7kbEP4odZFtCPhiKkmx3oyH87N ldtawyzd3PSLB8Z5N1nVHBqxUcU0U4YIc1LP0pFnPcUSb2PLoGYhw9TRhUvO8jxQaC75 YIug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112nBlltV8eH9JFB6r/LBfsD5hGqZkKDwmgaLMKTmukhDO5eiLLG rlEmvfXg9O09xMYkferB4KwDlw0g6kdZ
X-Received: by 10.55.15.34 with SMTP id z34mr30919899qkg.19.1501715026113; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.59.248 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 16:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:03:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBmDiRWTab-_SV26-i_100Y7YucgdfKTEVaYbg8XfTpMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113acef2af7c290555cd463b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/wAkQynUSR7ASTMEWsKQnG09fyCk>
Subject: [rtcweb] Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 23:03:49 -0000

This call begins a two-week working group last call on
draft-ietf-rtcweb-fec.  There is one outstanding issue:
https://github.com/juberti/draughts/issues/81, in which Bernard questions
the usefulness of the mandated OPUS FEC.  Comments on that issue are
solicited, as are any other issues which may be identified in review.

regards,

Ted, Sean, Cullen