Re: [rtcweb] Rejecting MediaStreamTracks in JSEP

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22311A0282; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:04:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIWZ1aKynrC6; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C6B1A0267; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:04:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=556; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391468659; x=1392678259; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zcCQH4Ox3RkF50xRpCJr9xU69MD1zSzBudpf2Xhhbrg=; b=IHuKhNGv5QUQ11YhAS1T1FKvx8UjsCBKpDp5V8DToW3TwlLKhgQi+ioB El6TIMB8MYGHl2X4yzg/wybufAa2W+o0a2L8HCx2DfWSSha4AIwBK7eQp 9V9l4wDc+I1En5FM+PwLlgj028ig4CnG+UQdXOWRY9GDyItjKBPi2f1gl Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFACwg8FKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwyBD74SgQ4WdIIlAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBYd9CM4fF4Jci3kzB4MkgRQBA5gqkiGDLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,775,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="17648626"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2014 23:04:08 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s13N48Ip015958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:04:08 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.180]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:04:08 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Rejecting MediaStreamTracks in JSEP
Thread-Index: AQHPIRX6Qu4MP4jRr0y9W7+nB8aK2pqkXPYAgAABqwCAAAS7AIAABcsAgAACEICAAAMlAIAADX2AgAAPCQA=
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:04:07 +0000
Message-ID: <C29AFA2E-E317-4476-8145-D6F58A0AF6ED@cisco.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-22T7hLMdC2je0nLk34MXQ8L+JFWLtAz--6Ryt+DMaMvQ@mail.gmail.com> <52EFF9E0.40808@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-2adSjCiwEp=QRcY+=cYKiiubyjz=rjeMHH4qC56BP1Vg@mail.gmail.com> <52EFFF3E.9080705@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-1iLOuJ-MhHpGp99j1qNieQTP9=EmTpibCh21fj5-6hMA@mail.gmail.com> <52F005D5.1020702@nostrum.com> <CAOJ7v-2MLWmuKCB1uL=fu2AVr4OkJ5dTXKXLBmv4kh=UqYm8Ug@mail.gmail.com> <52F013C9.1090609@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F013C9.1090609@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <EF62E94E62763D448C7A6BDC183BA0DE@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Rejecting MediaStreamTracks in JSEP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:04:22 -0000

On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 2/3/14 15:22, Justin Uberti wrote:
>> 
>> I was thinking a=recv-appId:0, which is both explicit, and has parallels with the zero port form of rejecting a m= line.
>> 
> 
> I have no objection to such an approach.
> 
> /a

+1 with Adam on we need something explicitly somewhere. 

If we do it with some combination msid / app-id - I just want to make sure the behavior is still reasonable with things that don’t low how to signal ssrc.