Re:IPR poll for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets

"Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <> Wed, 28 August 2019 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF321201DE; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAPT_pBxe6FP; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFD1120059; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-BB-Reception-Complete: 28 Aug 2019 12:17:57 -0400
X-IP-Listener: Outgoing Mail
X-IP-MID: 1051999607
Received: from (HELO msllnjpmsgsv06) ([]) by with SMTP; 28 Aug 2019 12:17:57 -0400
X-BLP-INETSVC: version=BLP_APP_S_INETSVC_1.0.1; host=mgnj5:25; conid=149
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:17:57 -0000
From: "Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <>
Reply-To: Albert Fu <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5D66A93500F6035A00390644_0_44242@msllnjpmsgsv06>
X-BLP-GUID: 5D66A93500F6035A003906440000
Subject: Re:IPR poll for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BOUNDARY_5D66A93500F6035A00390644_0_59863_msllnjpmsgsv06"
Content-ID: <ID_5D66A93500F6035A00390644_0_44237@msllnjpmsgsv06>
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:18:02 -0000

Hi Reshad,

I am not aware of any applicable IPR for this draft.


From: At: 08/27/19 17:25:41To:,
Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets


BFD WG, authors, contributors, 
We have started WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets and need to do an IPR poll. This mail starts the IPR poll. 
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets? 
If you are aware of a relevant IPR, please state whether this IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). 
At this moment, no IPR disclosures have been submitted on this document or the individual document it replaced. 
If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please reply to this email (reply-to-all) stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. 
If you are on the BFD WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly reply only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been  disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. 
Please note that the document will not advance to the next stage unless a response has been received from each author and contributor. 
This poll closes on the 13th of September 2019.