Re: WG LC, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-12

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 15 October 2025 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CA1744DE5A for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evAmGitVsa_Z for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6BBC744DD44 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-33ba38ed94eso165562a91.1 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1760553701; x=1761158501; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Uy5GFvSdlF016GiTn4N8lYM6IQ3nlaA5hucgVSzYnRk=; b=mnXFwDcYCEA3iv0HsalnMtepT5P+crkLlD3eLkHpNSj/WmE0ppAO0KaLJAYPN+ZmC9 /YDyPms61P++uh9Yyzl0Gmz7/cMrQOHTSAE6Y3//ypGcqDNH4vuSKY3yYARBOqyzZfCL qyKRRsIXBdyUH0vD2h362g/AH8S45sIsr3dnMOpKbob+TP2rESDhx7XPwm2My9XfNcLM LT40XV317X/G/JAY7keAU7W7MV2zgJE2Y5QoyjiarBS5XEPt+tfXl9jCjvce/asK28i/ 2VDnSkLbsywAOx31vrbSZ1hlyVskRgrA7r/Tb7IXGcs6Pkg/XK/DvhVmWJ/ozGJytRwc LfAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1760553701; x=1761158501; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Uy5GFvSdlF016GiTn4N8lYM6IQ3nlaA5hucgVSzYnRk=; b=PNK6GYmYb9s2l16J8bWoEowABTAGp4etlddmee9GxKWEWwYRfoOBMUnlHR4Gm1WJfw r/jRzWzxuqsnNVzN5RcsGL3vEAMg+85VUqksJPHXWTUQ2yP6e/Pm2WJ7dI57zCiuF2DS 4tfKlqZSQilO6865PQTyy2KXhhFine7x/K6nu53J5UbvUowzjUTO/JgFPvMvo2rgSR+v OY4j8AsISLkHH5WhkGstJB+iVBXxyAlu+Okxs0/sxMu5s15qt8cP4jdXGFNnNqcqx+Y6 LtZSIrQPQw9YKpkJ5HauH3f3AOVBF10I9WNDMwwX/7Cl15Iv79qyjOJQ1My6jzeO64/Z VIfA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWqZ5Im0/z79jBGX7Y1Q7GEdudJRh7PjkyM1ObPC8hQ/ob4QDImFDCwgRiNiWM1bnGT/Gmi7X9z@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0jw4/tBjZ/tOOKtykUgYPzbu7rk7O0YUsHBv8zMqXHf4MRrxK +qYy+CVCbfnB5tkfkq8YRB3azZ6CNQ3KHq/8e866g8+8e7bR30e/ucEy30WcjPg8Nf6zkzlVQMp bN/ozDl6RNbwlcVsa6c6UhC3zQ+DdLFs=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvw4Lq6cvHJQoZKV2Fn/4NVxuXjHXcKHhGyZNo++KXufpir+7wxJkIYUdLyi8h 5+x7pyTb2zo90t0S2Su3sn1HEbYzMbMCqLxKstAjf1EpvMbFw9qyF6S+pkSzqbHlwSbfsmdpwf8 9lVgoBX3I/Bo006u8QrR5Yi19Q/KMqkn61EPEq1hLVd3oG34hArSN1tMITRPRYbtgPGsaa/9WPf OYddRtjc3Fd/8Johk2nl5O9iIXw9aajkAEonuHiRjCier5nCdkEFIsvZ1mBq40t85EgtL0/hjmE CmQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtm8808ikyyySUwv5V24ukOu/39qDfej0cgBEO8PeNaDt/BgPhP7TX1bwSUe4/vjqt5gn/QplDDnK8tkMJg+g=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3d87:b0:32e:d011:ea1c with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-33b51112272mr43125107a91.15.1760553700600; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <GV4PR07MB11565B288DE0850EA74098659EBE8A@GV4PR07MB11565.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <GV4PR07MB11565B288DE0850EA74098659EBE8A@GV4PR07MB11565.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:41:30 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWCovC1UaDH_P_6qv5gX10P3e0UOl8ZejPnFBqSm4t8qTzaqPSNIwCcSbCI
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXytKJz2-f=OzGetUXY=NHiTeBqtg0y+2kqhCfY944gEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG LC, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-12
To: "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)" <matthew.bocci=40nokia.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eeaee3064136d964"
Message-ID-Hash: WQCAS7KEXQYGHUQT6S2URVNMLSR7ZARN
X-Message-ID-Hash: WQCAS7KEXQYGHUQT6S2URVNMLSR7ZARN
X-MailFrom: gregimirsky@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-bfd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: BESS <bess@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "bess-chairs@ietf.org" <bess-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/34dhb_qZyScdE879qG-dy0EN9No>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-bfd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Matthew,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

As a co-author, I support publication of this document.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 8:16 AM Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bocci=
40nokia.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello Working Group,
>
>
>
>  This email starts a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-12 (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd-12 - EVPN Network
> Layer Fault Management
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bfd/>).
>
>  Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS list, and
> whether or not you support progressing with publication of this draft as a
> standards track RFC.
>
>
>
> This WG LC notice has also been CC’d to the BFD working group list. BFD
> participants: please can you respond to the BESS WG list as this will
> greatly help in judging consensus.
>
>
>
> This poll runs until 31st  October 2025.
>
>
>
>  We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to
> this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document, please
> respond to this email and indicate if you are aware of any relevant
> undisclosed IPR.
>
> There is no IPR currently disclosed.
>
> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> We are also polling for any existing implementations as per [bess]
> Conclusion on the "one implementation policy"
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/>.
> Please reply to this email or directly to the BESS chairs if you are aware
> of any implementations of the draft.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Matthew (on behalf of the BESS chairs).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>