Re: WGLC for BFD base MIB and TC - ends November 8

["Srihari Raghavan (srihari)" <[e-mail]>]

Yes/Support.

Thanks
Srihari

On 25/10/13 12:36 AM, "Jeffrey Haas" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>This email is to initiate working group last call on the BFD MIB and
>Textual-Convention documents:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-mib-14
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-02
>
>The last call will complete on November 8, the end of IETF week.  Time
>will
>be available during the Vancouver IETF BFD session to discuss last call
>comments.
>
>I will be serving as document shepherd (RFC 4858) for this WGLC.
>
>Due to the small nature of the BFD working group and the fact that both
>working group chairs have contributed to the documents, we have gotten
>Carlos Pignataro ([e-mail]) to volunteer to serve as an
>independent party to gauge working group consensus.
>
>In order to facilitate the transparency of this WGLC, please remember to
>send all comments to the working group mailing list.
>
>As is often the case with MIB documents, implementations typically do not
>exist for the final form of the document.  Typically enterprise MIBs are
>implemented at some point in the document life cycle and then later the
>implementor will revise to match the published RFC, including OID
>code-points assigned by IANA.  Reviewers examining the MIB against
>deployed
>implementations are requested to bear in mind implementability of the
>final
>document vs. existence proof of the running code.
>
>Finally, note that no IPR polling has been done for these documents.
>MIBs,
>being IETF data models of things that themselves may have IPR, tend not to
>have IPR against them.  However, if someone is aware of IPR against these
>documents, please state it for the WG.
>
>-- Jeff (for the chairs)