Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on charter-ietf-bfd-07-03: (with COMMENT)

[Jeff Haas <[e-mail]>]

Benoit,

Draft-ietf-bfd-mpls-mib not the base MIB or the TC MIB. 

Jeff

> On May 28, 2014, at 16:26, Benoit Claise <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I'm confused.
> I thought that this entry was related to the two BFD mib modules on tomorrow IESG telechat? So very close to go the RFC editor queue AFAICT
> Or maybe, you're thinking of something else with this "MPLS MIB"?
> 
> Regards, B.
>> Benoit,
>> 
>> The MPLS MIB is still a remaining work item.
>> 
>> At this point we have no further management items but I suspect that S-BFD may eventually produce such work. Whether that is a MIB or a yang module is to be determined.
>> 
>> Jeff
>> 
>>> On May 28, 2014, at 14:28, "Benoit Claise" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>>> charter-ietf-bfd-07-03: No Objection
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bfd/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Hopefully, you can now remove:
>>>   1. Develop the MIB modules for BFD and submit them to the IESG for
>>>   publication as Proposed Standards.
>>> 
>>> And the famous milestones are absent.
>> .
>>