Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarifications-03: (with COMMENT)
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 14 October 2015 14:41 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6151A8A86; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tElmTEmpZdW2; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661EE1A8A4B; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 674D11E4DF; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:45:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:45:23 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Subject: Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarifications-03: (with COMMENT)
Message-ID: <20151014144523.GA28921@pfrc.org>
References: <20151014143827.30440.78575.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151014143827.30440.78575.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/GtVawjejoAX9yBXi1NTVvUQ5o-I>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarifications@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:41:21 -0000
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:38:27AM -0700, Brian Haberman wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Just a question on this draft... Given its status as clarifying (and > updating) RFC 5884, does it also inherit any of the IPR claims levied > against RFC 5884? > All existing IPR stands. No new IPR is introduced. -- Jeff
- Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-r… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-b… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-b… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-b… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-b… Brian Haberman