IETF Logo Mail Archive

Questions on draft-ashesh-bfd-stability-00.txt

"D'SOUZA, KEVIN L" <kd6913@att.com> Fri, 27 March 2015 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kd6913@att.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1605A1A00C2 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qTT8jmd7_qE for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41471A000B for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 703e5155.0.450236.00-2241.1202628.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <kd6913@att.com>); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 5515e307491bcde6-5a6f0f60f6c5a8d46a3c5fdd503bd3431ba387f4
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2RN8sae001897 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:08:54 -0400
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2RN8l9r001853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:08:52 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.148]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:08:29 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDH.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.8.97]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAD.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.148]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 19:08:29 -0400
From: "D'SOUZA, KEVIN L" <kd6913@att.com>
To: "'rtg-bfd@ietf.org'" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: Questions on draft-ashesh-bfd-stability-00.txt
Thread-Topic: Questions on draft-ashesh-bfd-stability-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdBo4mW50xu/AiZzTyGNpo8P5Uim8w==
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:08:28 +0000
Message-ID: <9ED31ABC3EC39645977C39A2E8283C7C20CA75D1@MISOUT7MSGUSRDH.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.53.211]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9ED31ABC3EC39645977C39A2E8283C7C20CA75D1MISOUT7MSGUSRDH_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=bvz78jmi c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=DugL2gm1cRYA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqp]
X-AnalysisOut: [o32RAAAA:8 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=taPFFvfeCmkL2QF6fzQA:9 a=Cj]
X-AnalysisOut: [uIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=gKO2Hq4R]
X-AnalysisOut: [SVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=GTDQhsSdk7lQVVUj:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <kd6913@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/MuVMP8oEUoNH2RIACq-YvqHJETM>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 23:10:34 -0000

Dear Ashesh and team,

This is the first time I am posting to this list so please bear with me if I am in error....
I have a few comments/questions on your draft:


1)     Could you clarify if interop will be supported between these features and a BFD instantiation that does not support these features

2)     Can you specify that these features will be optional for an implementation and some method should be provided to turn this capability off if needed

3)     Can you clarify in the scope the relationship between the measurements that one would obtain with this method vs other traditional methods to measure such criteria (e.g., CFM, TWAMP).  My concern is if this feature produces measurements that are different from the traditional methods, then it would be difficult to reconcile them in a production environment

4)     How would this impact the scale of the BFD protocol?

Thanks

Kevin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email