IETF Logo Mail Archive

S-BFD Documents Progress?

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 10 July 2015 01:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82301A3B9D for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mjv_DwpmFEyP for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED7A1A21BE for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4839; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436493092; x=1437702692; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=pl1NKKADvVVzPOEHvchcVQ5TmlIJ0ZnGqjfGOpunJ/M=; b=VqvO3/yDL8yaigl/fNjBAxIreqRM2hRGXLzsvF3dUq1HNWG6tywSD+64 GWG6ybS014F8fwlVxNCx5FcjxGnU67Z0LDR/zKfU89iTVXVc+mmQPATqY AVGgitAcYepQjqKboDxGFka3mtAQbH302SuIUgYRFGrVZZQlkz17POyPv k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CDAwBmJJ9V/4gNJK1bgxJUZoMauAkJgXGFd4FYOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEKiMGYgECCgo0AjQnBAEgiCANuGiWOQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEWBJBNgnMvgRQFlC0BgiyBVGaHGZhnJmODGII2gQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,443,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="167273974"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2015 01:51:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6A1pUjL004222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:51:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.220]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:51:30 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, "bfd-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <bfd-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: S-BFD Documents Progress?
Thread-Topic: S-BFD Documents Progress?
Thread-Index: AQHQurLwKQllfJ3Oo0quAQs5yeEtww==
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:51:28 +0000
Message-ID: <4597F9B4-6D67-44E7-95CC-5DAB9A2E839E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.252.37]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF15270E-EEDA-426E-A8FB-24F9E40CEE2C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/NXV3MUiE3L9mcjJWWXrI6iJvAww>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:51:32 -0000

Jeff,

The first set of S-BFD documents finished WG LC about 2 months ago.

However, they are still in “WG Doc” or “In WGLC” state, with no shepherd assigned and no write-up [1] [2] [3]; their related Milestones are months past due.

What is the target timeline for submitting these to the IESG?

Thanks,

— Carlos.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case/> “WG Document Dec 2014"
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base/> “In WG Last Call Mar 2015”
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip/> “In WG Last Call Mar 2015"

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email