Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06: (with COMMENT)

"Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com> Mon, 02 May 2016 22:09 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06: (with COMMENT)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160502220953.15818.52059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 15:09:53 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/Uivybz8baEaLh6Y31L9luF3TwEU>
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case@ietf.org, bfd-chairs@ietf.org

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Sec 3.7: This section describes BFD Fault Isolation.  It isn't clear
to me that the S-BFD base spec has addressed this case at all.  More
clarification would be nice - either indicating that this use-case wasn't
handled or having a small pointer to how it was.

Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-seamle… Alia Atlas
Re: Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-se… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)