Re: WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 04 December 2015 22:08 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357BE1ABD36; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:08:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYWy8BVrwJEx; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x229.google.com (mail-pf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683C61ABD38; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pfnn128 with SMTP id n128so32205664pfn.0; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:08:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=s+9zdoS/zVaNtYJpI+3uRWX9f9Gge9J4d36T0/TF90o=; b=IQDG+kPnaMEB+Abcl9fHpQj/cRZHZiHVCyiCw5vXLQZskyK3taAjCepJrnkx/Be0E7 P1VxtBH1/YcyhqLnEq0RiJ7wXOBtUY/bpnqF+UmDwuPfcoxNJCTzWstkEBgQP7RMHngy Sek4b/VION8jU1u0B09inHw6z/Gb4vWLSS5T47aMMC23pjn1q6s/i43vqlFBRlNGsJxC jRHh72UFdgMCx/n6tpB2yoBgMWgneRvDe4750QSBz9BQj1VYEzNKGvSNqawAYV+bXg9C ZhT+jOupCRQvN17o9KrE9NcmLX1nIyBhGfFTXA8z5V+b4omproSJqYLEDqQ2YHYSEhbN CDSw==
X-Received: by 10.98.86.132 with SMTP id h4mr25051802pfj.121.1449266890972; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-mahesh-nitro8.cisco.com ([128.107.241.165]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 25sm19096454pfp.62.2015.12.04.14.08.09 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_00CC4D94-1A47-42C3-8092-5B90EAFAB1E1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2876BE6.10C1BC%rrahman@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:08:07 -0800
Message-Id: <AB49FFBE-F9FF-4862-BFF4-38D8AC834189@gmail.com>
References: <D2876BE6.10C1BC%rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Reshad Rahman <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/W8ZJQDImLmbCa-vlAv2hPc7b1Aw>
Cc: "draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org" <draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 22:08:16 -0000
Will resubmit as draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication. Thanks. > On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This document has passed adoption as BFD WG document. > > Usual practice would be to resubmit as draft-ietf-bfd-authentication, however that could be a bit confusing. How about draft-ietf-bfd-authentication-optimization or draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication? > > Regards, > Jeff & Reshad. > > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Reshad <rrahman@cisco.com <mailto:rrahman@cisco.com>> > Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 7:03 AM > To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>>, "draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org <mailto:draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org>" <draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org <mailto:draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication@ietf.org>> > Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication > > BFD WG members, > > Please indicate to the WG mailing list whether you would support or not support BFD WG adoption of the following document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication/> > > Authors, as was mentioned at IETF94, you should get your proposal reviewed by the security group. > > Regards, > Jeff & Reshad. > <Mail Attachment.eml> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: WG adoption of draft-mahesh-bfd-authentication Mahesh Jethanandani