Re: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5880bis) - ZTE Details
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Fri, 03 July 2026 08:00 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3410D660F3 for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 01:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1783065625; bh=ziDq/60GtF4NgN/sZPLg4BxeGdGQzMwu9uPAF1jA6iM=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject; b=Zk2b+Badap3HOCDJSbXwtx7ctk5tyWkaAZne9tkdsTjs/AjmuF8pw0G/u02zpeQ88 fAYLiSatkWU16SC7zwJcFpJdk5EiUXtTO5NBdueJ3fIAmAaGukgn91I7MmSPY3EKOE cvC67D3eycpXZ5vXROQxfZZc0o9J47zfFnHbIrZM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BOeQXLGBpncB for <rtg-bfd@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 01:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [160.30.148.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE1410D660EC for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 01:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4gs5lS5VQfz8Xs6Q; Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:00:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app08.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.206]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 6637xqd2008270; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 15:59:52 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 15:59:54 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb6a476bfa57a-0fe8f
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20260703155954974Mjmn2_O1eaRvJI8Oz-yYA@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsy5sndtHCL7vHfu1_FZkxrx=GfPX4aUGs_1WiXF8kGJRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: CAMMESsy5sndtHCL7vHfu1_FZkxrx=GfPX4aUGs_1WiXF8kGJRQ@mail.gmail.com
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:59:54 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5880bis) - ZTE Details
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 6637xqd2008270
X-TLS: YES
X-ENVELOPE-SENDER: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-SOURCE-IP: 10.5.228.132 unknown Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:00:20 +0800
X-CLEAN: YES
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6A476C14.001/4gs5lS5VQfz8Xs6Q
Message-ID-Hash: ID4KKZ6JQMCR6W2BJL6UHTKACGPJ3BQX
X-Message-ID-Hash: ID4KKZ6JQMCR6W2BJL6UHTKACGPJ3BQX
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-rtg-bfd.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/dTi1CBbSErUxT4ZNkFArDxhCsJ4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:rtg-bfd-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rtg-bfd-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all,
Please find ZTE's implementation report as below.
Organization: ZTE Corporation
Implementation Name:
ZXROSNGV15.10.30
Description: Details about ZTE Implementation of RFC 5880.
Maturity: Widely used in general terms.
Coverage:
For each section, indicate if implemented or not.
6.3: unique discriminator per session - Implemented
6.4: Echo Function -Not Implemented
6.5: Poll Sequence - Implemented
6.6: Demand Mode - Not Implemented
6.7.2: Simple Password Authentication - Implemented
6.7.3: Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication - Implemented
6.7.4: Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication - Implemented
6.8.1: State Variables (indicate individual conformance)
bfd.SessionState - Implemented
bfd.RemoteSessionState - Implemented
bfd.LocalDiscr - Implemented
bfd.RemoteDiscr - Implemented
bfd.LocalDiag - Implemented
bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval - Implemented
bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval - Implemented
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval - Implemented
bfd.DemandMode - Not Implemented
bfd.RemoteDemandMode - Not Implemented
bfd.DetectMult - Implemented
bfd.AuthType - Implemented
bfd.RcvAuthSeq - Implemented
bfd.XmitAuthSeq - Implemented
bfd.AuthSeqKnown - Implemented
6.8.2: Timer Negotiation - Implemented
6.8.3: Timer Manipulation - Implemented
6.8.4: Detection Time Calculation - Implemented
6.8.5: Echo Function Failure Detection -Not Implemented
6.8.6: Reception of BFD Control Packets - Implemented
6.8.7: Transmitting BFD Control Packets - Implemented
6.8.8: Reception of BFD Echo Packets -Not Implemented
6.8.9: Transmission of BFD Echo Packets -Not Implemented
6.8.10: Min Rx Interval Change - Implemented
6.8.11: Min Tx Interval Change - Implemented
6.8.12: Detect Multiplier Change - Implemented
6.8.13: Enabling or Disabling The Echo Function -Not Implemented
6.8.14: Enabling or Disabling Demand Mode- Not Implemented
6.8.15: Forwarding Plane Reset - Implemented
6.8.16: Administrative Control - Implemented
6.8.17: Concatenated Paths - Implemented
6.8.18: Session Hold Down - Implemented
9: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism - Implemented
Licensing: Proprietary
Implementation experience: N/A
Comments (optional):
Contact Information: Zhao Yanhua - zhao.yanhua3@zte.com.cn
Date: July 3, 2026
Cheers,
Xiao Min
Original
From: AlvaroRetana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>;
Date: 2026年06月20日 04:04
Subject: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5880bis)
Hi!
This email starts an implementation/conformance poll for rfc5880.
Please consider the information requested below and reply to this poll with data about your implementation. You can do it in one of the following ways:
(1) Reply to this message.
(2) Fill out this form: https://forms.gle/M5ss7weaYebwjhRy5
(3) Submit a PR in GitHub; here's a template: https://github.com/bfd-wg/draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5880-bis/blob/main/rfc5880_Conformance.xml
Thanks!
Alvaro.
# Required Information
Organization:
Implementation Name:
Description:
Maturity:
Coverage:
For each section, indicate if implemented or not.
6.3: unique discriminator per session
6.4: Echo Function
6.5: Poll Sequence
6.6: Demand Mode
6.7.2: Simple Password Authentication
6.7.3: Keyed MD5 and Meticulous Keyed MD5 Authentication
6.7.4: Keyed SHA1 and Meticulous Keyed SHA1 Authentication
6.8.1: State Variables (indicate individual conformance)
bfd.SessionState
bfd.RemoteSessionState
bfd.LocalDiscr
bfd.RemoteDiscr
bfd.LocalDiag
bfd.DesiredMinTxInterval
bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval
bfd.RemoteMinRxInterval
bfd.DemandMode
bfd.RemoteDemandMode
bfd.DetectMult
bfd.AuthType
bfd.RcvAuthSeq
bfd.XmitAuthSeq
bfd.AuthSeqKnown
6.8.2: Timer Negotiation
6.8.3: Timer Manipulation
6.8.4: Detection Time Calculation
6.8.5: Echo Function Failure Detection
6.8.6: Reception of BFD Control Packets
6.8.7: Transmitting BFD Control Packets
6.8.8: Reception of BFD Echo Packets
6.8.9: Transmission of BFD Echo Packets
6.8.10: Min Rx Interval Change
6.8.11: Min Tx Interval Change
6.8.12: Detect Multiplier Change
6.8.13: Enabling or Disabling The Echo Function
6.8.14: Enabling or Disabling Demand Mode
6.8.15: Forwarding Plane Reset
6.8.16: Administrative Control
6.8.17: Concatenated Paths
6.8.18: Session Hold Down
9: Generalized TTL Security Mechanism
Licensing:
Implementation Experience:
Comments (optional):
Contact Information:
Date:
- Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (draf… Alvaro Retana
- RE: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha)
- Re: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Jeffrey Haas
- RE: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha)
- RE: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha)
- RE: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha)
- Re: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… xiao.min2
- Re: Implementation/Conformance Poll for rfc5880 (… Mahesh Jethanandani