Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-09: (with COMMENT)

Manav Bhatia <manav@ionosnetworks.com> Tue, 03 May 2016 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <manav@ionosnetworks.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA2512D77F for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2016 05:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ionosnetworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DmogKUw5RDFd for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2016 05:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1DF12D78B for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2016 05:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b189so20198595vkh.2 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 May 2016 05:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ionosnetworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=YIdBbpkyAlqcQ0P2Azz3Y7NZ3wpzL3uMR5Nl1tqv+SE=; b=DReKt3LYtrBNGSdvFm0CuHCSYQZ9rCyvPAAyUl3hW1HhM11BT7GoZeEoVgIYM/szpc LbQvgJ56WXfXKyYs+U9Ug7evnZPSBWnCLcUUYf/0oGSq2euLaPMsWdz19sWAoaWhWttF p87fqk1QEHzYEC//q5n+kjqf/V2otdisRKnqdUwL0Ie2Ftx8qgXFqi5wETem4D5EKPiW Y1zC4YaGefFAXvXAfjZAI+OQ/D4wYXCn7qwWGnBDVoaH7+4S7+2/g8xViY2OCpsqnmvg A6YYx47Tb1BU+DZCT/3UvQin8HTv4YV+2j/1LockQC58p1AbfoorZuELUDIt4qgvhIrb 8/XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=YIdBbpkyAlqcQ0P2Azz3Y7NZ3wpzL3uMR5Nl1tqv+SE=; b=Ceohdq1c5/85oQ+rnb+vs5yCvGLhwHH0DZKg6WzrXoCFWK9BklfoWhVf/RpaAmUe9u G/+V2D6VWrCHuAq36MVDaF/OXVDlimtJegcyTSjdIKP8x7DCPO4vGTa+FyLFESQUQfuu xID6noTKXy4kdLzcZkIPuvWl647ktOMaQNSTuY/B1LgPnA+jBPksGjW+XcP/awyHCE6I J7CTmCVaQTFGHB90TS9tqSTzh1RNsGlSeeEfIW9EEnIthlKdHmdBvgDN34X9ecsDhY9N NnQ5vMOvLozYom2AxlpuvFOBbRH9tfYsfuwxixy+IR3XnzMFqPsRnsI1VroiwuVNqrt3 NxAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWFikUYYmlxaORbEwQDJTgPA1mEjxyfIne1m27QANjSoj6JSZeEtNlMHfh6va1cBDf0+VuXZD6noh0anw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.233.4 with SMTP id g4mr848887vkh.61.1462277318235; Tue, 03 May 2016 05:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.32.197 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 05:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57289201.600@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20160503111437.7481.82666.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGS6MpAnFTYKh9cj6LV7V48sYTv5yVtBc3G=SCOorHP421pccg@mail.gmail.com> <57288CB6.9030202@cs.tcd.ie> <CAGS6MpCu6LQKpSdUuLQMR8iMbZgNUutxZ_g0DesXhJhkcjh=DA@mail.gmail.com> <57289201.600@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:38:38 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGS6MpC3nqLropKaVM26rLKohx8H0p1vDfotkhWqMKBr4ceaCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-09: (with COMMENT)
From: Manav Bhatia <manav@ionosnetworks.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c094a3c1df1760531eef868"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/dpQiZdShE0uXYQliVhFpe_uQtu0>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base@ietf.org, bfd-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 12:08:46 -0000

>
>
> I'd love to see someone write a draft about sensible things to do
> and silly things to do with all of the pre-shared keys used in routing
> protocols. If that exists, great! (And can you send a pointer? And
> then maybe refer to it from here.)
>

Am not aware of such a doc existing.


>
> If that doesn't exist, then adding relevant bits of it as appropriate
> seems to me like the best we might get. Or are you planning to write
> that?
>

:-)

No, i dont intend to write one.

We will add some text that says that one should not be using clear-text
passwords for SBFD since that provides no (surprise! surprise !) security
at all.

Cheers, Manav




>
> S.
>
> >
> > Cheers, Manav
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> S.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>