Replace "seamless" with "stateless"
Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com> Mon, 02 May 2016 23:52 UTC
Return-Path: <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA32612D533; Mon, 2 May 2016 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4a1kip66QEgW; Mon, 2 May 2016 16:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADBB212D538; Mon, 2 May 2016 16:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id t10so4399761ywa.0; Mon, 02 May 2016 16:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=zWp3ZDWcIhNGBUhL1lqGh0ZZ5swwZBJ0hkZlF3fdCds=; b=J53t6kjt7BLHkfa8o49EsJsLZDrjMVBgEgKA2nCHH/G6CmRNbv8MwcIYdWXh7Vl1Ea TdyIHgiFRtH+0qys2As4hURCn4UON/214IHws9b8CbVGm7Ya8Rk4gLaSb0o6gq9RimXm JFqG0ntsPHlsG+n2XJQbvqMaLjmlTSKEbYlHCUEWRAvUzguVZDY4piMxrmUx/563iC/5 erPvMS4XiILv/bEgtRsqARed/ILWiN+XN5ngWTBpaj18BvdHlI7y4nX1Kban5l9Yu2hO WuOcHtil56p4tC6b0xWRdprR8Nu2CX8mxRt95/jmm2/Et1IAEjXpQV01T/nn7Av/KdPP 81Pw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=zWp3ZDWcIhNGBUhL1lqGh0ZZ5swwZBJ0hkZlF3fdCds=; b=GN+cv9D9+KAH3NbxdJwpy5mR0+frmBz5Txdar4qI6HUN1NaXuDsflIfdvq8cCsLqtr xqa2aNcDeGrmm7vIdYjahCMBONHLilLJcpqvsPCAESUIjv5AfrHEro8HZxAFZge0K6Ei S4t9gkHHsr9f4EhKoMEJbbj8tSlzn9AnvzD9uPIijsBzJQ65F2UIT/IaGDBciLcYZPwd iBfjdtvJ+fNX0tx55Pf8YxRT0MrdSr3Zr7CjMZwFfZoKz3Ip5kibIqePQl168KSlwiFV rxNf28bkcfuv4W1UKP6ixy32nkj+ozfG6VtxaAZVsYxIvBTYlf56bvPM2LD2E7NilEcM OkpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUeAtb14xP4y1M9iXExR4oDI41r5wSQlxhXLebrOetCsYBIqGQbJhs+scgbVjcOEqwE9reFcHN2bbuzcw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.208.132 with SMTP id h126mr18909283ybg.185.1462233150981; Mon, 02 May 2016 16:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.216.129 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 16:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 05:22:30 +0530
Message-ID: <CAG1kdojLUSmyNqsf5bfxz+odHnK6T_3hTxRRti5vqsZdWd4hgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Replace "seamless" with "stateless"
From: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base@ietf.org, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05601a8b0b370531e4af18"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/fVGHBAO7Wlb_6GGMxDnKbcEXpmU>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 23:52:34 -0000
Hi, Does it make sense to change "seamless BFD" with "stateless BFD" in the documents? Its very convoluted to explain whats "seamless" about S-BFD. We called it "seamless" because it was simple and largely stateless. Any suggestions? Cheers, Manav
- Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Manav Bhatia
- Re: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Sam Aldrin
- Re: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Manav Bhatia
- RE: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Manav Bhatia
- Re: Replace "seamless" with "stateless" Jeffrey Haas