S-BFD Implementation Status
Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EE2129BCC for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2U7Tg59wjk-1 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7448A129BBD for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r203so33461538oib.3 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BUdsDtZVQMAMu0DeHHvT+yeP0GcHQUgGygpA2RgfHU8=; b=glPfZrthpF6lNvIfxHI1hcmQZhQRZ6dVXdc8f6rfC3iq2qshrhIrgslwXNiIvnelsM ALIgspLgFhxqG1+25ONXp0oCsp/FthvW93KuTlCm/EML5NzSy8rxzOY+2r3qYkss9jC4 da7UTsjdT+T8rzEUlf910kQ3f0GcF/jg/OJU+MbbjrF0wINe2q99/g/nOvw2YSDvLYnr 9arQzPBaa3fp3myJ7VoBqUJTtOzMgmH3U4FK453WqyxrFI633+S8s97Rf1Rw063apZex hDm1Cs1ZFMefWTF8NtVXhugngN1ezYD1d4mcNlhRfEFuXwm+etvx5WZ51GKnEhUpxyoL q8Dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BUdsDtZVQMAMu0DeHHvT+yeP0GcHQUgGygpA2RgfHU8=; b=gE6H17sJEry6uihX2AWallWpnkeLYDIF++t5+lS0YNYDWkFZI49r1DHKJPkVWfP8FO CxLz1kpOOXn3xYJfjepZtpGKetTe8S8SFj65pzCJDkqpgErIAxiTGk24iIElL7poSoXl ZzEeDxL7WGq/GkDxVF+iJgFSdHFBxqsgkWyLguS6KOKyGvypxsSvaFgakZwQy7RL9tW4 g0j3xe4gqRevZ+0ID43g2+TXr0UufedTzlwZt4qDJ1AAySf5hEOxH1n8NzrFk8UY0ddN nGuaipKREEa7zDIrbISraS5qgKODHgeQKR2BHEymgIU9smmHlC7/BjDb9kCMsGKBVUNR zCQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5bBYXiu38s4IydpXDW8ZexjfQK2Du2zPct36Rnosy9iW7/66M7VP2q/zvuDcp7iQHE8qvK53oRQwJU/g==
X-Received: by 10.157.40.80 with SMTP id h16mr617932otd.90.1492007465638; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.38.239 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:01:05 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKz0y8zHkjVcT+TX8aHy8+mg4Ai7e8h6QRjJUZRsRusws+1s=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: S-BFD Implementation Status
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b8fafdde4a054cf90e41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/gt_m83ITGer9dMJElWSJ54XZwnQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:23 -0000
S-BFD seems to the most appropriate mechanism that the head-end of a SR-TE tunnel can use to detect failure in the absence of local protection in one of the transit nodes.. Do we have any interop report for S-BFD? Or at least known implementations/vendors that support S-BFD? I know Cisco IOS XR supports it, based on publicly available information.. Regards, Muthu
- S-BFD Implementation Status Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal