Re: RFC 7419 on Common Interval Support in Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
Jeff Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 01 January 2015 03:56 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17D71A1B35 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:56:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nz803WZelSvr for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E858C1A00D8 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.151.188.151] (unknown [166.170.21.63]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37068C178 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:56:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeff Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: RFC 7419 on Common Interval Support in Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
Message-Id: <CF5BA7B8-BEB7-49E4-B481-2463605785AA@pfrc.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:56:04 -0500
References: <20150101024126.3390A180448@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150101024126.3390A180448@rfc-editor.org>
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B440)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/itHXlsyOHThr2UrT0Z-6mmxQNbs
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 03:56:08 -0000
Happy new year and congratulations to the Working Group for another RFC! Jeff > On Dec 31, 2014, at 21:41, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 7419 > > Title: Common Interval Support in Bidirectional > Forwarding Detection > Author: N. Akiya, M. Binderberger, G. Mirsky > Status: Informational > Stream: IETF > Date: December 2014 > Mailbox: nobo@cisco.com, > mbinderb@cisco.com, > gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com > Pages: 8 > Characters: 16944 > Updates: RFC 5880 > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-intervals-05.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7419.txt > > Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) requires that messages be > transmitted at regular intervals and provides a way to negotiate the > interval used by BFD peers. Some BFD implementations may be > restricted to only support several interval values. When such BFD > implementations speak to each other, there is a possibility of two > sides not being able to find a common value for the interval to run > BFD sessions. > > This document updates RFC 5880 by defining a small set of interval > values for BFD that we call "Common Intervals" and recommends > implementations to support the defined intervals. This solves the > problem of finding an interval value that both BFD speakers can > support while allowing a simplified implementation as seen for > hardware-based BFD. It does not restrict an implementation from > supporting more intervals in addition to the Common Intervals. > > This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. > > > INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. > It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of > this memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >