Couple questions on draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 14 March 2018 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8CD1200B9; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnrbGkK7xv_H; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B1E41274D2; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y2-v6so3228490lfc.5; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IHTF3kNxWTxwaHXi6FuztKM47WFsujV80IYiL1QKp/4=; b=C4FJtV9GVZCH3h1S+kd2baIcp1LgNPlBpmhVcXVmAO6ERZz5+GI64mpofy8YiYaFSh 18nn1omlLeQZeyTz67awKsHJXRS87HrigiQamaS1Z1ebmtfhRvqK14vxIZ1K/mMCuSJd ZAfLcEUvHGM/QrA+W93OYexxOlpT78SX+DOcbw+FrJSFFnKekXrg2gcSntbo12Yx96Ps IoA8kCIUGCbzOrSCNpr0ZvGh0bpSQmfB/+Dz63OygCjwlJdZMDDQJgRFfM2itwAfFg6v CM13kDaTTecYJiJ2cgXJ1iXQHYxWp1GVenda2XNDIE4cKLWdz4ehZFZFs7yYPAe+i7/9 1PvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IHTF3kNxWTxwaHXi6FuztKM47WFsujV80IYiL1QKp/4=; b=ZRo2OMV71kNFmWdOare2039NtnuJl61oBG0CaXvTBoePRImsXS9ZJGpR11NsqxiWZq KHrttCao9n1ePG81GUEkgZ+BIxRu3NL+pC1i7BsvxOclByn6ow0GG1Yb/Y4aFhVo/gGo txrP3zIzd2ui4WHVUl8xIKn+vuo9bKRTmMFK8wg/JQilgU1crhB3++i8uiLWiW9X9dyz HjUHcZzKnRDKDViR9nvPLYy8IKe09Uc7P/Cf4w3bLlj6RyyhjOfhopwkg5cNKrzVfszF Tcq+c37hEa8TN37UlTZk64TKL3tv8px5znB/BB8T1f0KJLohlQk4usQOBRGN7S+VLsP+ CmYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Ev7PYEOfSh7/XPD6hzDPVW+GSsh9IJeuIjzYdwcc/RbVwtTceL UV8HP2qF723XqkZG7C2tQsxxu3+zjl6My1flDro=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtnKnJauYcfPxaRiYvYTy58AEHiTkK6uBqYsdkZJkTOU4EzF08gh1Q/G0mvD8smjb8HmitCE+KViPzx2bL62Ws=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:771b:: with SMTP id s27-v6mr3357267lfc.138.1521040340170; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.145.195 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 08:12:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU8Z4oBdwzTZp_Ke1WVTL-_EC05gnhi-H1uCeLVci_p+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Couple questions on draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited
To: draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002a3ec1056760cd92"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/sRXSr9oUMHQmqm4PEtCzOaxyMyo>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:12:27 -0000
Dear Authors, thank you for bringing your proposal to the discussion at BFD meeting in London. I have couple questions: - which BFD mode, Asynchronous or Demand, you envision to be used by the Unsolicited BFD; - if you consider the Demand mode to be used by the active BFD peer from the very start, have you looked at BFD for Multipoint Networks <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint/>. I think that Unsolicited BFD is close to special case, p2p it is, that draft. Regards, Greg
- Couple questions on draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited Greg Mirsky