Re: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-bfd-05.txt> (TRILL: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Support) to Proposed Standard

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 01 June 2012 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF5A11E8104 for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.319, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7GkVshAAGWIi for <rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B98511E80EA for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2780CD2A1; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:14:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:14:47 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-bfd-05.txt> (TRILL: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Support) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20120601161447.GW4067@pfrc>
References: <20120523211548.28200.46941.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEEtaixFbWm2+n2C_Zw9sVwxK5YHksKv=nkreoQ-so=p3w@mail.gmail.com> <20120601144011.GQ4067@pfrc> <CAF4+nEEe85f4w7-cRbV0nPrKqE829N2dtwnSv7YbxkbsHmfZXg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEe85f4w7-cRbV0nPrKqE829N2dtwnSv7YbxkbsHmfZXg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-bfd@tools.ietf.org, trill-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:14:48 -0000

Donald,

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:05:08PM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:
> > One minor editorial comment: RFC 5881 should probably be an informative
> > reference.
> 
[...]
> and
>    "... TRILL BFD parameters ...   The default
>    values are the same as in the IP BFD case [RFC5881], except where
>    specified in this document such as for Hop Count."
> 
> Perhaps, in the first quote above, "similar to" should be changed to
> "the same as". In any case, at least the second quote looks kind of
> normative to me....

I had missed the second item and I agree with you.  I withdraw my comment.
:-)

-- Jeff