Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 15 December 2022 06:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited@ietf.org, bfd-chairs@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: (with COMMENT)
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <167108529751.47175.11043166679613124771@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 22:21:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/yYN2BsUBKPsDzp1Fv4gjcNkL_T8>

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

For Section 5, it is common (but not mandatory) to put each IANA action in its
own subsection.

The SHOULD at the top of Section 2 is peculiar.  It indicates you would only
make this non-configurable in an implementation in some unusual circumstances. 
What's an example?

Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker