Re: BFD docs to last call

David Ward <dward@cisco.com> Mon, 24 March 2008 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rtg-bfd-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-bfd-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4408B28C49E; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.849, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zpilzem+qu+z; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B883A68E5; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DE93A68E5 for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzbRH1xkCiYC for <rtg-bfd@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620683A6C85 for <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,547,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="2927034"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2008 15:01:05 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2OJ15sU013872; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:01:05 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2OJ15ko019783; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:01:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.52]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:01:05 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([171.68.225.134]) by xmb-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:01:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E2E4E076-242F-4D07-BAF5-97C3167C4791@cisco.com>
References: <E2E4E076-242F-4D07-BAF5-97C3167C4791@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <DF971101-B25C-45C1-AAED-EAE5BE92F5D5@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: BFD docs to last call
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:01:00 -0500
To: David Ward <dward@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2008 19:01:05.0195 (UTC) FILETIME=[692FAFB0:01C88DE1]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2210; t=1206385265; x=1207249265; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dward@cisco.com; z=From:=20David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20BFD=20docs=20to=20last=20call |Sender:=20 |To:=20David=20Ward=20<dward@cisco.com>; bh=zCSiXsrAapUQxTsviurksjhVHaxIewku4JtyKkmxd98=; b=UE3993kHCNOEqQqPwkWFcLPbNfPkYM/TWzbSBOJ5ihCjBKs1WrInpL+EDW 5y4Lv/t1j69798lLOEcUSKZxf1dk8LdUeiMmwOTJB+P+7ztZhyQmvxpiaAaS vZWsXSJB8h;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=dward@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: kireeti@juniper.net, Dave Katz <dkatz@juniper.net>, thomas.nadeau@bt.com, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>, BFD WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org

All -

These documents have finished WG LC.  One document draft-ietf-bfd- 
v4v6-1hop, required some clarifying text (thanks Carlos) which has  
already been submitted. Thus, we are calling WG LC "completed."

There has been a recent modification to the MIB (-04) but, we need  
another advancement of the MIB to include all the functionality in  
the documents below. We will progress what we have but the MIB will  
hold up PS status (we will have official versions thankfully of all  
of the base documents).

As a WG we will not turn to the point to multipoint spec and the DHCP  
bootstrapping drafts.

Onwards and upwards ...


-DWard, Jeff Haas



On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:51 AM, David Ward wrote:

> All -
>
> We would like to last call the entire suite of the BFD protocol  
> documents. It has been a long time coming but, the extra time has  
> allowed for many interoperable implementations to be created and  
> through feedback from implementors; the specifications have been  
> updated to cover corner cases, clear up language/grammar/intention,  
> etc. In general, the documents provide what is necessary to  
> implement interoperable BFD and should be considered complete.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-base-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-generic-04
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-v4v6-1hop-07
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-multihop-06
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-mpls-05
>
>
> We have not put the MIB (expired and being updated) and the new  
> multipoint draft into Last Call. As soon as the MIB is updated we  
> will get an expert review and then LC.
>
>
> For this last call, if you have comments or nits please have the  
> subject line include for example: bfd-base-07 (as appropriate) so  
> that your email clearly specifies which draft you are commenting  
> on. Given that everyone is so familiar w/ the set of specifications  
> and the delta to this rev is rather small, we are going to have a  
> 2.5 week Last Call period. It will end Feb 22, 2008.
>
> Many thanks to the implementors and reviewers that provided feedback.
>
>
> -DWard, Jeff Haas