IESG agenda for 2009-02-12 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 09 February 2009 12:00 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180233A6B35 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuemxaPv7gCK for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F713A6AA9 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n19C021W075912 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n19C02PM075910 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:00:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200902091200.n19C02PM075910@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-02-12 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:00:02 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-02-12). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date RTG Feb 05 Dissemination of flow specification rules (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward TSV Feb 05 A One-Way Packet Duplication Metric (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ippm-duplicate Token: Lars Eggert 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date RTG Feb 05 ForCES Protocol Specification (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-forces-protocol [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG Feb 05 The RPF Vector TLV (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector [Open Web Ballot] Token: David Ward 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN Feb 05 IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) (Proposed Standard) draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date APP Feb 05 Downgrading mechanism for Email Address Internationalization (Experimental) draft-ietf-eai-downgrade [Open Web Ballot] Note: Harald Alvestrand is document shepherd Token: Chris Newman Requirements for the Conversion Between Permanent RTG Feb 05 Connections and Switched Connections in a Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Network (Informational) draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG Feb 05 Description of the RSVP-TE Graceful Restart Procedures (Informational) draft-ietf-ccamp-gr-description [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon 3.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT Feb 06 Requirements for Multicast Support in Virtual Private LAN Services (Informational) draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date GEN Feb 05 Analysis of Inter-Domain Routing Requirements and History (Historic) draft-irtf-routing-history [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon GEN Feb 05 A Set of Possible Requirements for a Future Routing Architecture (Historic) draft-irtf-routing-reqs [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 late IPR declarations (Jari Arkko) 6.2 Document Submission cutoff for IETF 74 (Tim Polk) 6.3 IESG Statement on Activities that are OBE (Russ Housley) 6.4 Potential Notes in EAP-FAST Documents (Russ Housley) 6.5 Request for ATOM Link Relation [IANA #209057] (Michelle Cotton) 6.6 ATOM Link Relations requests [IANA #221766] (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-02-12 telechat. Bill Fenner