Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 29 September 2017 10:39 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF83134460; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIySXTLfqgXX; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BF9132199; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 03:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4829; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1506681548; x=1507891148; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=HGaMUWVxIF+Ee8tC8Ax1mjlARTp5yhYmQpth5d4k4E8=; b=MA7R4bb37F0KZEeIRp9z8anMSjTNdJHFk7kJf2L2kiXz2q8Oxj1tiPic sx/HlslBgIKWzdxUmF1wLndUwxby2TNaRk2qzQF9hrYFldICSg5lKDiA3 pRUXOQxCcDS8Rv44by1KMqd+hESmFr70/S8ZmUoRqzNsbeBaQ95+bmyQl o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C+AADTIc5Z/4QNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1xkbieDeIofj2CBdohCiCuFPoISCiOFGAIahBE/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkGI1YQAgEIBAoGKwMCAgIfERQRAgQOBYlNTAMVEKcegieHPg2DeQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2DLYICgVGBaiuCfYJegkaCcy+CMQWKGJZYPAKHXIgNhHmCFFuBFYN+iwWMbYg0AhEZAYE4AQ8QOIEOeBVbAYcKdgGIOQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.42,452,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="83538444"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Sep 2017 10:39:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (xch-rtp-019.cisco.com [64.101.220.159]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8TAd60d019241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:39:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-019.cisco.com (64.101.220.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 06:39:06 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 06:39:06 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com>
CC: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.all@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
Thread-Index: AQKh+qSr0qN2hBFPssjBQ7VqF9nZsaEuKQ9Y
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:39:06 +0000
Message-ID: <674C5C6D-FB5A-495C-A660-9D1DEAD4CFF7@cisco.com>
References: <06fe01d338c5$560d95c0$0228c140$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <06fe01d338c5$560d95c0$0228c140$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_674C5C6DFB5A495CA6609D1DEAD4CFF7ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/1_Gqbs3q5ZA6-1ycKmwnWVCeL4E>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:39:10 -0000
Thank you, Russ, for the review! Sent from my iPad On Sep 28, 2017, at 9:50 PM, Russ White <7riw77@gmail.com<mailto:7riw77@gmail.com>> wrote: (resend with correct address) Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10 Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 9/28/2017 IETF LC End Date: 9/29/2017 Intended Status: Experimental No issues found. This document is ready for publication. The draft is readable and clear about the process, potential problems, and the experimental results of trying the mechanism described. No major issues, no minor issues, no nits. /r
- [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark Russ White
- [RTG-DIR] R: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-m… Fioccola Giuseppe
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)