IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-02

"Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <keyupate@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B841AD0A2 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:52:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1y2CyJf5IOL0 for <rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69501B2A6B for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:52:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9044; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421279564; x=1422489164; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Dj+YXT03NmtYzgKIKIpUCz26lsjlF6R+znU5ClYk164=; b=Cbcdjcc1905zpkog4/fFSi/ODF6wEZO39DdzdREAbsc6bRbbtzAxDQZ/ XEywbnbopVeZ826WK3kUDmU/4jBnW9Ni/UXoF2LsijQi+JU6GA7J1E6Jr JQZsFn0o8KJ28hPieBpuHKMemN7ONLIrZSsUPYKu5pR7Wln9rOmlHqCik g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AioOALEAt1StJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagkNDUlgBA4MBwRyBaYVxHntDAQEBAQF9hBMjVhIBHC4CBDAnBA6IMQ28X5QbAQEBAQYBAQEBAQEcj2gRgm+BQQWMZ4Fbg0WFSIEPMIJCh12GHiKDbnCBRH4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,400,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="387091582"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2015 23:52:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0ENqhPA004664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:52:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.25]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:52:43 -0600
From: "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>
To: "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-02
Thread-Index: AQHQMFUwmXiwA7LJJUuMu46WFdPmXQ==
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:52:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D0DC4149.CCE0%keyupate@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [10.24.11.210]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0DC4149CCE0keyupateciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/48YfDlJOWEuUkomht5RhWnhsUyE>
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-02
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:52:47 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir.

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-02
Reviewer: Keyur Patel
Review Date: 14-Jan-2015
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:
No major issues found. Minor nits are listed below. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:
IMHO, the document is well written and easily understood.

Major Issues:
None.

Minor Issues
None.

Nits:

  1.  Section 2, General Scenario: Replace : Confederations RFC 5065 [RFC5065] are not being implemented between the ASNs with : BGP AS Confederation RFC 5065 [RFC5065] is not enabled between ASNs.
  2.  Section 2, General Scenario: For Line starting with (2nd paragraph): "In the following examples”, please list the section number where these examples are described (Section 4).
  3.  Section 3: Can we replace the reference of companies with SPs?
  4.  Section 3.1: Replace : Overlapping ROAs with multiple ROAs (its not overlapping ROAs its multiple ROAs showing different ASes owning originating prefixes)
  5.  Section 3.2.1: Isn’t the problem of increased ASPATH length explained in section 3.2.2 applicable to 3.2.1? If so can reference it in 3.2.1 as well?
  6.  Section 5.2:  Can we refer to the fact that this is the only case where an extra signing is done for before sending an update to an IBGP session?

Regards,
Keyur

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email