Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-22

[Ines Robles <[e-mail]>]

Hi Linda,

Thank you for addressing my comments, please find my answer below,


On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:10 PM Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
>
> * Some mitigations include references, but It would be nice to add
> references to all of them.
>

[Ines] what do you think about this comment?

>
> * It would be nice to add in each mitigation, the costs of applying it.
> [Linda] the cost depends on the service providers. It is out of the scope
> of this document to describe the cost.
>

[Ines] Ok, but the abstract states that it covers the costs as follows:
"This document also describes the mitigation practices for getting around
the identified problems and discusses the benefits vs. costs of the
practices."
If the costs are not covered, maybe some further clarification is needed.

>
>
> * What means a site capacity goes dark?
> [Linda] Meaning the capacity goes to zero
>

[Ines] Thank you, Then, maybe it can be changed to indicate that the
capacity goes to zero?



> * The mentioned problems and mitigations applies for 5G Standalone and
> Non-Standalone deployments options?
> [Linda] The 3GPP’s Edge Computing is for 5G only.
>

[Ines] Maybe you can add this as clarification, something like "..for
standalone deployments option...", What do you think?

Thank you,

Ines.

>
>
>
>