[RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-11 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 08 March 2010 21:05 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C6A3A69BE for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtXD77wBPkOE for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:05:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (unknown [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319CF3A69A2 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o28C09Sj055897 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.net)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o28C09QY055896 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:00:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:00:09 -0800
Message-Id: <201003081200.o28C09QY055896@runaway.fenron.net>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: [RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-11 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:05:47 -0000
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2010-03-11).
See also: Document on Future IESG Telechat Agendas and IESG Discuss
Positions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of Past Telechats
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
OUTSTANDING TASKS
Last updated: March 4, 2010
o Magnus Westerlund to draft an IESG Statement on BCP 32.
o Ron Bonica to propose text for determining when one document updates
another.
o Lars Eggert to find a designated expert for Remote Procedure Call
(RPC).
o Lars Eggert to review the TCP Options request and make a
recommendation to the IESG.
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Items
Area Date
INT Mar 08 DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR) (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-13 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@shinkuro.com) is the document
shepherd.
Token: Ralph Droms
RAI Mar 05 Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries (Proposed
Standard)
draft-ietf-ecrit-specifying-holes-02 [txt]
Token: Cullen Jennings
TSV Mar 05 Transport Protocol Port Randomization Recommendations (BCP)
draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-06 [txt] [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) is the Document
Shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
Was deferred by Cullen Jennings on 2010-03-04
RAI Mar 05 Filtering Location Notifications in the Session Initiation
Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10 [txt]
Note: The Document Shepherd for this document is Richard
Barnes (rbarnes@bbn.com)
Token: Cullen Jennings
INT Mar 06 IPv6 Subnet Model: the Relationship between Links and
Subnet Prefixes (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-08 [txt] [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the
document shepherd.
Token: Jari Arkko
INT Mar 05 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-mext-binary-ts-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: The document shepherd is Marcelo Bagnulo
(marcelo@it.uc3m.es)
Token: Jari Arkko
INT Mar 08 Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC
(Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation-02 [txt] [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd: Andrew Sullivan (ajs@shinkuro.com)
Token: Ralph Droms
INT Mar 08 SEND Hash Threat Analysis (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat-09 [txt]
Note: Document shepherd: Marcelo Bagnulo
(marcelo@it.uc3m.es)
Token: Ralph Droms
TSV Mar 06 The TCP Authentication Option (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document
shepherd.
IPR: * Juniper's Statement of IPR related to
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-02
Token: Lars Eggert
APP Mar 08 SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport (Standard)
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: S. Moonesamy (sm+ietf@elandsys.com) is the Document
Shepherd.
Note that all downrefs were called out during the IETF LC
and are as per IESG discussion earlier this year.
Token: Alexey Melnikov
TSV Mar 06 Cryptographic Algorithms for TCP's Authentication Option,
TCP-AO (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document
shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
INT Mar 05 IP Mobility Support for IPv4, revised (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3344bis-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Pete McCann (pete.mccann@motorola.com) is the
document shepherd.
Token: Jari Arkko
2.1.2 Returning Items
Area Date
SEC Mar 05 Use of the RSA-KEM Key Transport Algorithm in CMS (Proposed
Standard)
draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-11 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: proto shepherd is Blake Ramsdell <blaker@gmail.com>
IPR: * Sean Turner's Statement about IPR related to
draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-05 belonging to Various
Token: Tim Polk
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Items
Area Date
Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for
APP Mar 05 the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) (Proposed
Standard)
draft-gould-rfc4310bis-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> is the document
shepherd
Token: Alexey Melnikov
INT Mar 07 IANA Rules for PANA (Protocol for Carrying Authentication
for Network Access) (Proposed Standard)
draft-arkko-pana-iana-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ralph Droms
2.2.2 Returning Items
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which
it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Items
Area Date
RTG Mar 05 Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks
(Informational)
draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework-08 [txt]
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Martin Vigoureux
(martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com) is the Document
Shepherd.
Token: Tim Polk
Was deferred by Ron Bonica on 2010-03-02
APP Mar 05 Mapping Characters in IDNA (Informational)
draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
RAI Mar 05 Prefix elements for Road and House Numbers in PIDF-LO
(Informational)
draft-ietf-geopriv-prefix-00 [txt]
Note: The Document Shepherd for this document is Alissa
Cooper (acooper@cdt.org)
Token: Cullen Jennings
INT Mar 05 IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks (Informational)
draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02 [txt] [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Ryuji Wakikawa (ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com) is the
document shepherd.
Token: Jari Arkko
RTG Mar 05 Mandatory Features in a Layer 3 Multicast BGP/MPLS VPN
Solution (Informational)
draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations-06 [txt] [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
3.1.2 Returning Items
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which
it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Items
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Items
Area Date
INT Mar 05 Pre-authentication Support for PANA (Experimental)
draft-ietf-pana-preauth-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot]
IPR: * Toshiba America Research, Inc.'s Statement regardfing
IPR claimed in draft-ietf-pana-preauth-01
Token: Jari Arkko
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses: 1) The IESG has concluded
that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing; 3)
The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt
the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the
document at this time; 4) The IESG has concluded that this document
violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be
published without IETF review and IESG approval; or 5) The IESG has
concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that
requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without
IETF review and IESG approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the
document write-up in the Data Tracker, and the document shepherd
may supply text for an IESG Note in the write-up. The Area Director
ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by
the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request
inclusion of the IESG Note.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be
passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Items
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Items
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
TSV Jan 22 Peer to Peer Streaming Protocol (ppsp)
Token: Lars
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
7. Working Group News
- [RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-11 telechat. Bill Fenner