[RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-04 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Wed, 03 March 2010 20:27 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD1928C26B for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:27:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QITgvkfRG1wu for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:27:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (unknown [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C4C28C21D for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o21C04qE005219 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.net)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id o21C04h4005214 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:00:04 -0800
Message-Id: <201003011200.o21C04h4005214@runaway.fenron.net>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: [RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-04 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:27:15 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2010-03-04). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of Past Telechats 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat OUTSTANDING TASKS Last updated: February 22, 2010 o Magnus Westerlund to draft an IESG Statement on BCP 32. o Ron Bonica to propose text for determining when one document updates another. o Lars Eggert to find a designated expert for RFC 5661. o Ralph Droms and Adrian Farrel to update the wiki to reflect circumstances in which implementation is desired before standardization. o Jari Arkko to ask Phil Roberts if he is willing to serve as the designated expert for RFC 5563. If not, Jari will find an expert. o Jari Arkko and Ralph Droms to work with Michelle Cotton to find a new multicast expert. 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Items Area Date RTG Feb 28 LDP Typed Wildcard FEC (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel TSV Feb 27 Transport Protocol Port Randomization Recommendations (BCP) draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Lars Eggert INT Feb 28 Use of GOST signature algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Olafur Gudmundsson (ogud@ogud.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Protocol RTG Feb 28 Extensions for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks (MLN/ MRN) (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-extensions-12 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Lou Berger (lberger@labn.net) is the Document Shepherd. Token: Adrian Farrel SEC Feb 24 Trust Anchor Management Protocol (TAMP) (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pkix-tamp-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 2.1.2 Returning Items Area Date OPS Feb 24 IPFIX Export per SCTP Stream (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This document was already reviewed and approved by the IESG. The IETF Last Call is redone for Proposed Status following the DISCUSS by Alexey. IPR: * Cisco's Statement of IPR relating to draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-02 Token: Dan Romascanu 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Items Area Date SEC Feb 24 GSS-API: Delegate if approved by policy (Proposed Standard) draft-lha-gssapi-delegate-policy-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk RAI Feb 28 Dynamic Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) (Proposed Standard) draft-singh-geopriv-pidf-lo-dynamic-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: LC will not have ended by the time this is on agenda but the odds are high there will be zero LC comments. If we decide to approve, I will hold a discuss on any LC comments. Richard Barnes (rbarnes@bbn.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Cullen Jennings Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for APP Feb 26 the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) (Proposed Standard) draft-gould-rfc4310bis-06 [txt] Note: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> is the document shepherd Token: Alexey Melnikov 2.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Items Area Date RAI Feb 28 Updates to Asserted Identity in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) draft-ietf-sipping-update-pai-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings SEC Feb 28 The application/pkix-attr-cert Media Type for Attribute Certificates (Informational) draft-ietf-pkix-attr-cert-mime-type-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Shepherd is Steve Kent <kent@bbn.com> Token: Tim Polk SEC Feb 24 Heuristics for Detecting ESP-NULL packets (Informational) draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Yaron Sheffer (yaronf@checkpoint.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Pasi Eronen 3.1.2 Returning Items NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Items Area Date SDP and RTSP extensions defined for 3GPP Packet-switched RAI Feb 24 Streaming Service and Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (Informational) draft-westerlund-mmusic-3gpp-sdp-rtsp-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] IPR: * Nokia Corporation's statement about IPR claimed in draft-westerlund-mmusic-3gpp-sdp-rtsp-00.txt Token: Cullen Jennings SEC Feb 28 HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (HKDF) (Informational) draft-krawczyk-hkdf-01 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 3.2.2 Returning Items NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses: 1) The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time; 4) The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or 5) The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the document write-up in the Data Tracker, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Items NONE 3.3.2 Returning Items NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RAI Feb 09 SIP Recording (siprec) Token: Cullen APP Feb 12 Constrained RESTful Environments (core) Token: Lisa TSV Jan 22 Peer to Peer Streaming Protocol (ppsp) Token: Lars 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under Evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date OPS Feb 16 ADSL MIB (adslmib) Token: Dan 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Approval of application/exi media type (Alexey Melnikov) 6.2 Approval of application/widget media type (Alexey Melnikov) 6.3 PowerPoint to HTML conversions for the proceedings (Russ Housley) 7. Working Group News
- [RTG-DIR] IESG agenda for 2010-03-04 telechat. Bill Fenner