IESG agenda for 2006-02-16 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 13 February 2006 12:00 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F8cNJ-0005Fu-OA; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:00:13 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F8cNJ-0005Fm-7K for rtg-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:00:13 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA12390 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:58:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110] helo=mail-white.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F8cau-0005Wx-M7 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:14:17 -0500
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (frogbits.attlabs.att.com [135.197.129.116]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDCA147DE4 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:00:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DC02r3038938 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1DC02cQ038937 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:00:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200602131200.k1DC02cQ038937@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2c12be3f3a8d57895fb9c003e1517c01
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-02-16 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2006-02-16).
Updated 2:2:21 EDT, February 13, 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
OPS Feb 9 Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of
13
Real-time Application Quality of Service
Monitoring (RAQMON) Framework (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 13
draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-framework-14.txt
Note: IETF Last Call still in progress, ends
Monday Feb 13.
One new rev will come out Monday to address
GenArt review comments.
Real-time Application Quality of Service
Monitoring (RAQMON) MIB (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-mib-11.txt
Transport Mappings for Real-time Application
Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Protocol
Data Unit (PDU) (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-12.txt
Token: Bert Wijnen
Multimedia Terminal Adapter (MTA) Management
OPS Jan 30 Information Base for PacketCable and IPCablecom
compliant devices (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 13
draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-09.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Still in IETF Last Call, which ends Feb 13
(Monday);
So if serious comments come up from that I may
have to withdraw
it from Agenda.
Token: Bert Wijnen
RTG Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification
Statement (BCP) - 3 of 13
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Alex Zinin
The Key ID Information Type for the General
SEC Extension Payload in MIKEY (Proposed Standard) -
4 of 13
draft-ietf-msec-newtype-keyid-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The
OPS Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 13
draft-ietf-grow-rfc1519bis-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: David Kessens
INT Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions
(revised) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 13
draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Margaret Wasserman
INT HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers (Proposed
Standard) - 7 of 13
draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-sha-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: The PROTO Shepherd for this document is
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>.
Token: Margaret Wasserman
OPS Feb 9 Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Application (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 13
draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: A new rev is expected Feb 9 or 10 to
address some AD review comments and a comment
from Sam Hartman on MD5 usage.
PROTO SHEPHERD: John Loughney
<john.loughney@nokia.com>
Token: Bert Wijnen
RTG Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 9 of
13
LDP Specification (Draft Standard) - 9 of 13
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-03.txt
Experience with the LDP protocol (Informational)
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-experience-00.txt
LDP Implementation Survey Results
(Informational)
draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-survey2002-00.txt
Token: Alex Zinin
APP Sieve Extension: Relational Tests (Proposed
Standard) - 10 of 13
draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
SEC Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 11 of
13
Public Key Cryptography for Initial
Authentication in Kerberos (Proposed Standard) -
11 of 13
draft-ietf-cat-kerberos-pk-init-34.txt
Note: proto shepherd: jhutz@cmu.edu
OCSP Support for PKINIT (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-krb-wg-ocsp-for-pkinit-06.txt
Note: Minor comment about security
considerations sent to WG. I'm holding this
draft until pkinit catches up.
Token: Sam Hartman
Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and
SEC GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with the Internet
X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and
CRL Profile. (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 13
draft-ietf-pkix-gost-cppk-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Proto shepherd is Steve Kent
<kent@bbn.com>
Token: Russ Housley
Suppression of Session Initiation Protocol REFER
RAI Method Implicit Subscription (Proposed Standard)
- 13 of 13
draft-ietf-sip-refer-with-norefersub-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO shepherd dean.willis@softarmor.com
Last Call ends 2/17. On IESG agenda 2/16.
Comments encouraged to the end.
Token: Allison Mankin
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
RTG Subcodes for BGP Cease Notification Message
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-idr-cease-subcode-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Bill Fenner
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and
RAI DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses
Configuration Information (Proposed Standard) -
2 of 4
draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-09.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Over-ride vote requested; please review
accordingly.
Token: Ted Hardie
INT Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard)
- 3 of 4
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: This document and
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different
solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to
advance both and essentially "let the market
decide."
Token: Mark Townsley
INT Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS
(Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: This document and
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different
solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to
advance both and essentially "let the market
decide."
Token: Mark Townsley
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
INT Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem statement
(Informational) - 1 of 5
draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Margaret Wasserman
INT DHCP: IPv4 and IPv6 Dual-Stack Issues
(Informational) - 2 of 5
draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Margaret Wasserman
Trait-based Authorization Requirements for
RAI the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
(Informational) - 3 of 5
draft-ietf-sipping-trait-authz-02.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO shepherd
gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
Token: Allison Mankin
OPS Feb 9 Evaluation of Candidate CAPWAP Protocols
(Informational) - 4 of 5
draft-ietf-capwap-eval-00.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Bert Wijnen
Objectives for Control and Provisioning of
OPS Feb 9 Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP)
(Informational) - 5 of 5
draft-ietf-capwap-objectives-04.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Bert Wijnen
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV SDP Descriptors for FLUTE (Experimental)
- 1 of 2
draft-mehta-rmt-flute-sdp-05.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Allison Mankin
SEC Repeated Authentication in IKEv2
(Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
Simple Middlebox Configuration (SIMCO)
GEN Protocol Version 3.0 (Experimental) - 1 of
1
draft-stiemerling-midcom-simco-08.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
Area Date
APP Jan 30 Email Address Internationalization
(eai) - 1 of 1
Token: Ted
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
RTG Jan 30 Secure Inter-Domain Routing (sidr)
- 1 of 1
Token: Alex
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
Area Date
INT Feb 10 MIPv6 Signaling and Handoff
Optimization (mipshop) - 1 of 3
Token: Margaret
GEN Jan 26 Intellectual Property Rights (ipr) - 2
of 3
Token: Brian
TSV Feb 9 TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
(tcpm) - 3 of 3
Token: Jon
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-02-16 telechat. Bill Fenner