IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3278A120937; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:38:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=GQ8PMrdl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=LPopb58v
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nmn-ues7iGhv; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760D51208D8; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:38:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15735; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1573231109; x=1574440709; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=z7ASjnOA+T9xZEa4ZLn2VqN45hhIrLuURCzPnDM9TfY=; b=GQ8PMrdlwHGf+mt+wb/AoW0BFZrpfeHt0tBOaO4RBzRw5XG8fyMSoyCJ zawXirYHHjKZXbbMYdqwQAW3BOFjbzs0V7pFBGkaImxmn+/WNXbLMbHNx iuDCGxkl2tj+j7lH3LfxhQMtP9l6TQkFnRNENCTUPOnYa9wfSgRMis5L0 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Tfh6Fhx5yqhSDYvXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YRGN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A+GsHbIQKUhYEjcsMmAl1CcWIBGXwLeXhaGoxG8ERHFI=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CtAAB/mcVd/4QNJK1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgX6BHC9QBWxYIAQLKoQpg0YDimmCOSWJVolGhGKCUgNUCQEBAQwBASMKAgEBhEACF4N5JDgTAgMLAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUQEBAQEDEhEdAQE3AQ8CAQgRAwECKwICAh8RHQgCBAENBSKDAAGBeU0DLgECDKgOAoE4iGB1gTKCfgEBBYUGDQuCFwmBNoUahnoYgX+BEAEnDBOCTD6BBAGBFjwLAgKBfwYHgmMygiyNLYInN4VCiT2ORkEKgiSGM2SKG4QSG4I8coZvj1iOR4g1ghKPKgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBPyoigVhwFWUBgkEJRxEUkBIkDAwLFYM7hRSFP3QBgSePXwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,282,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="375766706"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Nov 2019 16:38:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA8GcRE0004196 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:38:28 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:38:27 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 11:38:25 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:38:25 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ixn4M7OdroK0VtzY9T04B7r4Uf0liBkqqaheJSXOiVq8VylfLXb5wdYpno6l1wdEfHUCKuUoR2R6HTAZyZMV8KP/5lQtrA/9aLtC6ZpNZbs0DkpefSPcXp7cx6YSu/HhkbqKL8yyPkyZzmBycq1Gy9KFF6n392pV2pO+xNmsVfsFRhlUZwPJOAnZrvBpMC/Mm1c1pk6acm6yOY4/QWLeWYwOqjagN88DgPR3RYrMnHGgqApddUvyvAbVmX87XMJjJdEJ1tAfh14ygmg8O3u/CtUvl4LnfCT6f6bGaBVnkS4pk9tZRrBjHwMz5tR/ur3ZwChamHUDPn7fhiNPIOxnsA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=z7ASjnOA+T9xZEa4ZLn2VqN45hhIrLuURCzPnDM9TfY=; b=eier4FXruzc+x6aDTcwsZRPursjwhe8jcEgSH+vrsKEEcV+P58nNosuOBjXDoGDSz58Y8mb3ViC1wfBwQY8y8V93MBBbIm3fFyxW/UnqWjb8I/p9mb/9Xk3mGHxd0TLMboEqTlS8KEYVNMpmSN1RdRNIkh9wBczR4Y/Z/UtlfQI71pIBIjnvoxv0n8exIqIY/ZunMGGAIstIS7c0qG6LKk5Rba+B16aFIBdO6Vyy4hjtHu0PT/qFkCFj2a8aBN76U43Gg1QGyVgj3gjVJp1HKYXczthM879ZHBIw+F5Iy/+CDOooIQHpR3TXyNAm2i6P4iwrA8slXJH9e5LXQIhHkg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=z7ASjnOA+T9xZEa4ZLn2VqN45hhIrLuURCzPnDM9TfY=; b=LPopb58v8jUUSc/ETIHW8F8QwHq2rwaXy5KA5pZ1TbtEQPiFIVZoSGY3kYdPPantcxwAmDfQKi8sWzTWI+JdsyufGvnA/PyplJv+NiPh0ih9NmO5w+45yxwpVgq7hbr80QRtvZ0bop49cCIzO2rV/uP5XPubuSozafMEUHeFz4U=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.23; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:38:24 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::218b:2d04:e653:105]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::218b:2d04:e653:105%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.023; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:38:24 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
CC: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.all" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.all>, "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>, LucAndré Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVlZZHrYJsjyaVa02L2grvus04qKeBJuIA
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:38:24 +0000
Message-ID: <61D54CFD-08F1-4061-AE4B-12CDC634B064@cisco.com>
References: <156597621582.31946.11513292936064073351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FD272CD60@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com> <2EC640EF-CFBA-4FFC-8139-D9DB992E3D08@gmail.com> <D5011876-A481-453E-B3BC-6521BCC13C34@cisco.com> <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FD283349E@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CA4C70FE-F783-44BD-A361-9543D9CAC357@cisco.com> <025452E6-4D8A-48C5-8AE2-4FE157488E25@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <025452E6-4D8A-48C5-8AE2-4FE157488E25@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::5e]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e268d54f-fd19-401b-cbb7-08d7646a133b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4093:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB409314FE768FB4B8BF445676C27B0@MN2PR11MB4093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0215D7173F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(376002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(476003)(6246003)(53546011)(99286004)(7736002)(86362001)(6506007)(110136005)(91956017)(446003)(2616005)(606006)(478600001)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(4326008)(33656002)(66946007)(5660300002)(6306002)(186003)(14444005)(236005)(66446008)(6512007)(25786009)(11346002)(81166006)(81156014)(54906003)(2501003)(256004)(46003)(36756003)(76116006)(6486002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(102836004)(54896002)(8676002)(76176011)(316002)(14454004)(486006)(8936002)(6116002)(229853002)(6436002)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4093; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HPkO5XxVMT17gc10vyvPlsyDqrmwRjeM07c8ZN2vYWkv3yuaKn9ksA5KRrm67qLW1/3FoeVCRf7wn2sP6k1bZkezojsRCjekbv4lEA3AgbfhAGMY/ITgTK91wJhsBNequXLoDeWw5IYhr3i1TvcCj/fUd4yfYH5H4vxjpUJ5XHYpuKSwGYIMUoi7SXsPYGYliowpXbR8AfXwLfTqR4pTLQFq//mIKg/bFxtw3iWU8LJVeVsZYjWl1Mwm/7AOwlsPE8wGFlR/G8ERDhWiJC0V+QZl3LOYmJT3DdNdgXUiyInwX41YOG1IJqBsqh9fml9RlLBc3k0Gskxqh8Voe6eUTU4Rxo1MXcpD8/NzNv21TsytDOYAzMVBqiUSEWcs/ykfpFmPUyHMBEISJKvxjp/nMHNVjcLhC+80mFQ3WLB//sQwmf3u+PnD6SNMYImpCFyAq0x7FLvykt36BB5VrkXyGd/9SvcAovOI1CIz29HNTTk=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_61D54CFD08F14061AE4B12CDC634B064ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e268d54f-fd19-401b-cbb7-08d7646a133b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Nov 2019 16:38:24.6622 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: NrKN51j9HNeRAJsQutzJCJd57ABEKS9zu4QjFPxYZbzXsDJsigHC4pTGqYBt2CW4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4093
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.16, xch-aln-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/HA3IeqPbcOHMPYHwm1YJ0mEZqqU>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 16:38:38 -0000

Thanks Stewart for the review!

I did a search on MPLS-TE RFCs and it is, in fact, hyphenated in most instances. I’m sure the authors will incorporate your comments in the next revision.

Thanks,
Acee

From: rtg-dir <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 1:07 PM
To: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: Routing Directorate <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.all" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.all>, "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>, LucAndré Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt


Hello,



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir><https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir%3E> ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir



Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.



Document: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt

Reviewer: Stewart Bryant

Review Date: 2019-10-07

IETF LC End Date: date-if-known

Intended Status: Standard Track



Summary:
I apologies for the delay.

I found version 10 to be well written.

WRT Daniele’s question of whether this is needed. I think the text in the introduction substantiates a need and I am inclined to support publication.



Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Editorials:
(e.g., SRTE,

   LFA)

SB> The terms SRTE and LFA need to be expanded in the abstract.

OSPFv3 when MPLS TE and GMPLS are not deployed or are deployed in

SB> Should be MPLS-TE (well know term)

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email