IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 07 November 2019 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8C1120978; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:07:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6R-b1l_mkEi; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD9F12096F; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id l17so2703732wmh.0; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:07:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=nlntAOz+cULGCs27W8Ya6IadQ6G+D3pQvNF2XX/DteU=; b=J3tpBqDIh37RmXCm1Yh/xgGgTgL6f3K5kLqygtrUA6y0A0cLkGFkh/6gRyEdYtRbvh wJl55F7BlB66+RxBfbAogh6p80GbZlx7pS84G+0HJat6Hb6esjmvM2Gaq8a3uS2aq3tr mcaQOEbJM8H4NS7CRcS1GsD3+gf9uSGm/NIv9iR+wrCly9Sjyeya3GtiU0KozFFBB3n+ La3kf4D7g90b7F3zDCq+G+C/tI3fX9at9MGMK3IZaASmwHlkpKOWZFCrtbEGUU6pJ0G1 32Uufsgqh1gEAKmj9cL0wl0dz43MKIOrCDQM2+TYRFc7yzC/NGnMgJXIp2qRtama1N3Q BniQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=nlntAOz+cULGCs27W8Ya6IadQ6G+D3pQvNF2XX/DteU=; b=kdmuDgFegsWjopJ6M1xxrwaFXH1QOyh92dB7B9E+ciHmdXiDdOHvhe4a2kkTl/opJL S+kp56VzTmyEp5zEzTEokgDzMwrK/eUCk7TeNFqalB8bUPyFMkkBvwFeCm8tP+DfOUJT LDATady3u9peTzcdvGFtJe7e8vYgrZ03sSTUYfy1Q3S0zxtkJwf96NJcUJ1XOe1zAxvO Xyixd3hcPmusZ45QI6Yfjne7dSmLMCW3iS7dEDPkWQRG2T4126m65euvDUhEmrv76TMV vPHoJASNZb+ZcvqxdrhbgQ3Y65OveIK/SSNAavYQZn4MAT06hUf4II0dvGElVLya0L7h ESgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUvWFalbUtFCgPenvpeuiwZEBqOTuixxtp6KCh+QND2N0IhS2nP Yuz31nDtsHyZRWxFnvAn+bwskkNUmig=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzHmMe0XBI3FJxUkY7NlwyykLHZaFSJA3T59G+ljSi3uOOY62ct383sTjg9KnaAnZJ3rFAyFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c75a:: with SMTP id w26mr4069594wmk.18.1573150058931; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w18sm3179158wrp.31.2019.11.07.10.07.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:07:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <025452E6-4D8A-48C5-8AE2-4FE157488E25@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_82C98923-8734-454F-AF30-3369D75579EC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:07:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CA4C70FE-F783-44BD-A361-9543D9CAC357@cisco.com>
Cc: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>, LucAndré Burdet <laburdet.ietf@gmail.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.all
To: rtg-ads@ietf.org
References: <156597621582.31946.11513292936064073351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FD272CD60@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com> <2EC640EF-CFBA-4FFC-8139-D9DB992E3D08@gmail.com> <D5011876-A481-453E-B3BC-6521BCC13C34@cisco.com> <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FD283349E@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CA4C70FE-F783-44BD-A361-9543D9CAC357@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/R9CEkD-bTF5yO0qQVqvNCN8pYZw>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgRir review requested: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:07:43 -0000

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see  <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir%3E> ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.txt
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2019-10-07
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known
Intended Status: Standard Track

Summary:
I apologies for the delay.

I found version 10 to be well written.

WRT Daniele’s question of whether this is needed. I think the text in the introduction substantiates a need and I am inclined to support publication.

Major issues: none
Minor issues: none
Editorials:
(e.g., SRTE,
   LFA) 
SB> The terms SRTE and LFA need to be expanded in the abstract.

   OSPFv3 when MPLS TE and GMPLS are not deployed or are deployed in
SB> Should be MPLS-TE (well know term) 

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email