IESG agenda for 2006-08-03 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 31 July 2006 11:02 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7VXH-0000lt-Sh; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:02:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7VXH-0000lo-CO for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:02:11 -0400
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.200.81]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7VXF-0005fw-1B for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:02:11 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-24-6-155-213.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.155.213]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060731110202011008hkh3e>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:02:08 +0000
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6VB1Npw031023 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:01:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k6VB1NEa031022 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:01:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:01:23 -0700
Message-Id: <200607311101.k6VB1NEa031022@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bb031f3a6fb29f760794ac9bf1997ae
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-08-03 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2006-08-03).
Updated 2:2:41 EDT, July 31, 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Management Information Base for the Session
RAI Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard)
- 1 of 4
draft-ietf-sip-mib-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd is Dean Willis
Token: Cullen Jennings
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RAI Conference Bridge Transcoding Model (Proposed
Standard) - 2 of 4
draft-ietf-sipping-transc-conf-03.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
The Internet IP Security PKI Profile of IKEv1
SEC /ISAKMP, IKEv2, and PKIX (Proposed Standard)
- 3 of 4
draft-ietf-pki4ipsec-ikecert-profile-10.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
OPS Observed DNS Resolution Misbehavior (BCP) - 4
of 4
draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Proto shepherd: Rob Austein
Token: David Kessens
2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
SEC IKE and IKEv2 Authentication Using ECDSA
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-auth-ecdsa-06.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: An updated draft was submitted since
this was on the agenda. It contains several
minor corrections; the biggest is to assign
values for IKEv2 as well as IKE.
Token: Russ Housley
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Framework for Transcoding with the Session
RAI Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) - 1
of 2
draft-ietf-sipping-transc-framework-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
SEC Lightweight OCSP Profile for High Volume
Environments (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
A Framework for Inter-Domain Multiprotocol
RTG Label Switching Traffic Engineering
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
Domain-based Email Authentication Using
SEC Public Keys Advertised in the DNS
(DomainKeys) (Historic) - 1 of 4
draft-delany-domainkeys-base-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
GEN CellML Media Type (Informational) - 2 of 4
draft-miller-media-type-cellml-05.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
Mounting Web Distributed Authoring and
APP Versioning (WebDAV) servers (Informational) -
3 of 4
draft-reschke-webdav-mount-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Added to agenda to discuss with W3C
liaisons
Token: Lisa Dusseault
SEC Multiple Authentication Exchanges in IKEv2
(Experimental) - 4 of 4
draft-eronen-ipsec-ikev2-multiple-auth-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
GEN Apr 11 A Process Experiment in Normative Reference
Handling (Experimental) - 1 of 1
draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: RFC 3933 process experiment
Token: Brian Carpenter
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
OPS DSL Forum Vendor-Specific RADIUS
Attributes (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-mammoliti-radius-dsl-vsa-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
Area Date
TSV Jul 27 TCP Maintenance and Minor
Extensions (tcpm) - 1 of 1
Token: Lars
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
TSV Jul 5 Robust Header Compression (rohc)
- 1 of 1
Token: Magnus
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-08-03 telechat. Bill Fenner