IESG agenda for 2009-09-10 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 07 September 2009 11:00 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE653A6858 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.211, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K5cEsTI2QY1v for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (runaway.fenron.com [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6516F3A6987 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n87B0fE6032362 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:00:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n87B0fF7032361 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:00:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 04:00:41 -0700
Message-Id: <200909071100.n87B0fF7032361@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-09-10 telechat.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:55:25 -0700
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:00:10 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-09-10). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date INT Sep 05 Transmission of IP over Ethernet over IEEE 802.16 Networks (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802-dot-16-10 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gabriel Montenegro <gmonte@microsoft.com> is the Document Shepherd for this document. Token: Ralph Droms RTG Sep 05 Node behavior upon originating and receiving Resource ReserVation Protocol (RSVP) Path Error message (BCP) draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This document should be processed in a batch with draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute and draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption. draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption should be read as the last of the batch. Token: Adrian Farrel RTG Sep 04 MPLS Traffic Engineering Soft Preemption (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption-18 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This document should be processed in a batch with draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute and draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr. draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption should be read as the last of the batch. Token: Adrian Farrel RTG Sep 05 PathErr Message Triggered MPLS and GMPLS LSP Reroute (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-gmpls-lsp-reroute-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This document should be processed in a batch with draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption and draft-ietf-mpls-3209-patherr. draft-ietf-mpls-soft-preemption should be read as the last of the batch. Token: Adrian Farrel Diameter Proxy Mobile IPv6: Mobile Access Gateway and Local OPS Sep 05 Mobility Anchor Interaction with Diameter Server (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu OPS Sep 07 Diameter User-Name and Realm Based Request Routing Clarifications (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dime-nai-routing-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu INT Sep 05 Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mip4-generic-notification-message-10 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Pete McCann (pete.mccann@motorola.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Jari Arkko TSV Sep 05 Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion Information (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pcn-baseline-encoding-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Steven Blake (sblake@petri-meat.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Lars Eggert INT Sep 05 Segmented Pseudowire (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-13 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Stewart Bryant (stbryant@cisco.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date RAI Aug 29 A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Media Feature Tag for MIME Application Sub-Types (Proposed Standard) draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Robert Sparks 2.2.2 Returning Item Area Date GEN Aug 27 IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions (BCP) draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: There is no document shepherd Token: Jari Arkko Was deferred by Cullen Jennings on 2009-08-27 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date RAI Sep 04 Identification of Communications Services in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) draft-ietf-sipping-service-identification-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Robert Sparks INT Sep 05 Basic HIP Extensions for Traversal of Network Address Translators (Experimental) draft-ietf-hip-nat-traversal-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Gonzalo Camarillo (Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ralph Droms APP Sep 07 IMAP Support for UTF-8 (Experimental) draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> has agreed to shepherd the document. Note that the normative reference to obsolete RFC 1341 is intentional. The name parameter was defined in RFC 1341 across all media types. The subsequent version of MIME (2045/2046) deprecated it. Token: Alexey Melnikov APP Sep 05 Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Problem Statement (Informational) draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Jon Peterson (jon.peterson@neustar.biz) is the document shepherd. Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date RAI Sep 06 A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for the Identification of Services (Informational) draft-drage-sipping-service-identification-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Robert Sparks 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item Area Date GEN Sep 02 Unintended Consequence of two NAT deployments with Overlapping Address Space (Informational) draft-ford-behave-top-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date APP Sep 03 Virtual World Region Agent Protocol (vwrap) Token: Alexey 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RAI Aug 24 SIP Common Log Format (sipclf) Token: Robert 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date OPS Sep 02 IP Flow Information Export (ipfix) Token: Dan SEC Aug 24 Security Issues in Network Event Logging (syslog) Token: Pasi SEC Aug 24 Network Endpoint Assessment (nea) Token: Tim 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Jun 24 DNS Extensions (dnsext) Token: Ralph 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Appointment of Language Tag expert reviewer as per draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-23 (Alexey Melnikov) 6.2 Link Relations Request [IANA #259813] (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-09-10 telechat. Bill Fenner