RE: [L1vpn] Proposed charter for L1VPN WG

["Hamid Ould-Brahim" <[e-mail]>]

Tomonori,

> 
> I think framework document can describe service requirements.
> 
> Curret framework document (draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-03) already 
> contains service requirements. There may be some detailed 
> points to be 
> discussed, especially for the enhanced mode (sig+rtg model), 
> as we see some 
> discussion. (Framework document is describing a broad range 
> of things, but 
> not at the level of protocol requirements.) So, it may be 
> necessary to 
> narrow down the scope for the enhanced mode, which can be 
> done through the 
> mailing list, or if needed, through writing a separate draft. 
> (I don't 
> think we have an immediate need to write a separate draft.)
> 

I do agree the framework draft covers the requirements and is inline 
with ITU L1VPN work. An option that can be considered is to separate 
the requirements from the framework in separate internet draft and 
let the two drafts progress independently (from work point of view).
I assume at certain point solutions (and not the framework) would have 
to be compared to the set of requirements listed.

Hamid.