[RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-03
Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 18 February 2024 05:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F840C14F697; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:44:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-multi-topology.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.5.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170823505004.47909.7317758852549230467@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:44:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/S9Vwy0iHJVVjtFCx0_VO71i3rA0>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-03
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 05:44:10 -0000
Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review result: Has Nits Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-multi-topology-03 Reviewer: Yingzhen Qu Review Date: 17 Feb 2024 IETF LC End Date: n/a Intended Status: Standards Track Result: Ready with Nits The document is well rewritten and is ready for publication. The following nits are for the authors to consider. Nits (line numbers are from idnits): 133 just the default Topology. An instance of such a sub-topology is Should this be "default topology"? 148 particular Topology to be used by mLDP have to become a two tuple s/Topology/topology s/two tuple/2-tuple ? 303 New MT MP FEC element SHOULD be used as the Tunnel identifier. s/New/new s/Tunnel identifier/Tunnel Identifier
- [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-m… Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker
- Re: [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ie… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)