IESG agenda for 2006-01-19 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 16 January 2006 12:01 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyT3W-00070C-Mr; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:01:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyT3U-0006zj-Or for rtg-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:01:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA06700 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:00:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110] helo=mail-white.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyTBP-0005v9-LQ for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:10:00 -0500
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (frogbits.attlabs.att.com [135.197.129.116]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DD7147C28 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:01:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0GC0UXA087760 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:00:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0GC0U6R087759 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:00:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:00:30 -0800
Message-Id: <200601161200.k0GC0U6R087759@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a4cdc653ecdd96665f2aa1c1af034c9e
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-01-19 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2006-01-19).
Updated 2:2:30 EDT, January 16, 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV Definition of Managed Objects for SCSI
Entities (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
draft-ietf-ips-scsi-mib-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Last Call ends 16 Jan - Last Call
comment from Bert is handled in Note to
RFC Editor; PROTO shepherd black_david@emc.com
Token: Allison Mankin
SEC Group Security Policy Token v1 (Proposed
Standard) - 2 of 11
draft-ietf-msec-policy-token-sec-05.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
APP Sieve Email Filtering: Vacation Extension
(Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11
draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document shepherd is Cyrus Daboo
<cyrus@daboo.name>
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
INT HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers (Proposed
Standard) - 4 of 11
draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-sha-05.txt
Note: 1/12/06:Â Waiting for -06 version to
address LC comments. The PROTO Shepherd for
this document is Olafur Gudmundsson
<ogud@ogud.com>.
Token: Margaret Wasserman
APP LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
draft-ietf-ldapbis-strprep-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ted Hardie
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
APP Syntaxes and Matching Rules (Proposed
Standard) - 6 of 11
draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-11.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ted Hardie
APP LDAP: Schema for User Applications (Proposed
Standard) - 7 of 11
draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-10.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Ted Hardie
INT Provisioning, Autodiscovery, and Signaling in
L2VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
draft-ietf-l2vpn-signaling-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
TSV Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 9 of
11
RTP Payload Format for MIDI (Proposed
Standard) - 9 of 11
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-format-14.txt
Note: PROTO shepherd
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com; IETF LC ends
Jan 20.
An Implementation Guide for RTP MIDI
(Informational)
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-midi-guidelines-14.txt
Note: PROTO shepherd
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
Token: Allison Mankin
INT PWE3 Frame Check Sequence Retention (Proposed
Standard) - 10 of 11
draft-ietf-pwe3-fcs-retention-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
SEC IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Protocol
(MOBIKE) (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11
draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Proto shepherd is Jari Arkko
<jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
Token: Russ Housley
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: This document and
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different
solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to
advance both and essentially "let the market
decide."
Token: Mark Townsley
INT Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: This document and
draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different
solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to
advance both and essentially "let the market
decide."
Token: Mark Townsley
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
APP Considerations for LDAP Extensions (BCP)
- 1 of 1
draft-zeilenga-ldap-ext-09.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ted Hardie
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Architecture for the Use of PE-PE IPsec
INT Tunnels in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (Experimental) - 1
of 4
draft-ietf-l3vpn-ipsec-2547-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
Service Requirements for Layer 2 Provider
INT Provisioned Virtual Private Networks
(Informational) - 2 of 4
draft-ietf-l2vpn-requirements-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
SEC ECC Cipher Suites for TLS (Informational) - 3
of 4
draft-ietf-tls-ecc-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Proto shepherd is Eric Rescorla
<ekr@networkresonance.com>.
Token: Russ Housley
INT DHCP Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE)
Options (Informational) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-dhc-pxe-options-02.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: The PROTO Shepherd for this document is
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>.
Token: Margaret Wasserman
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.1.3 For Action
Area Date
A Lexicography for the Interpretation of
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching
RTG (GMPLS) Terminology within The Context of the
ITU-T's Automatically Switched Optical Network
(ASON) Architecture (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-lexicography-06.txt
Note: The ITU-T wishes to refer to this
document in G.8081 Amendment, to be consented
in their meeting Feb 6 to Feb 17 so we should
request expedited publication by February 10th.
Token: Bill Fenner
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RAI P-User-Database Private-Header (P-Header)
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-camarillo-sipping-user-database-02.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: RFC 3427 review for P-Header conducted
on SIPPING list by Dean Willis
Token: Allison Mankin
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
Area Date
TSV Jan 13 Session PEERing for Multimedia
INTerconnect (speermint) - 1 of 1
Token: Allison
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
OPS Dec 21 ADSL MIB (adslmib) - 1 of 1
Token: Bert
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-01-19 telechat. Bill Fenner