Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd.txt
Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> Sun, 29 April 2018 11:08 UTC
Return-Path: <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0818126C2F; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAMZ1tQ3cZs4; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448A4120454; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id i3so9830808wmf.3; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RpyfmlaOsZTaSbI8A4Ndsd9iJbtBH+RDK/Gxmjdd1aU=; b=DrcdtKfOgxmIlYepWACyF5sCqDp11oPbiB5LT0pawjTfV+82kBS5wa8gfybnwzGWFK lpMoMoOYCtVm9geZDlxnlcfMjY33EQYsf6Er0Fejze1w6oWUWX1vG5sdbf7lR2iY0QfG tXVGFhJtOO0fCg72mgYbe3n9Kwh5SzQSHCAVSL6pjA9e3NE/eAt7Rwm0/bfeg/UBGbZa 2l5w/p10XWmOCKYcNlzjskUTIKAIQ1ziOntgkno/lKjXo5dpwunoEMQUXlUU3+4k7ZPK CtfSw4CxdBfEfWfYgiQHnpAQxEJz11TWsNgzslaTYfTVMlvpuCWTe8YsIfyy7tZjVuUf idWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RpyfmlaOsZTaSbI8A4Ndsd9iJbtBH+RDK/Gxmjdd1aU=; b=VJrRBq32qWn39Iyon6UtSdSt0dampviI96fjmhqezZ9VsEqt+1A4uajQACor4PsMq2 j1QZ8qmDOlHYFv1dfxkAmC/2fQP/IVk8REXDsTFrAaFKnYqB7B35CwlQOnXUoLEude0J zlBSXpmGYzq6o90kFPKlOzZwz/vT4004EiyRPy0Pf7dd7hbORQl6VMeXexpztE24nbEf D9TAwrMLC01Xc2L0y3TFGWxLhqfcIMwu77DA2uWaJtUq5dZbL4M1fCNxcSGYC1loG22C EkxQb1voBZ8bhmRWs/sCFhMwyvmCv4nVLH08dxqNRl7Sb80bMpxxjQjkFZ7I/o9DAu8C 2NCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDgmLKoMUHySRqo0zMroFqSl3MTkaYV4IJU2PoxPSjsUDOeiggx ru+NH8IIQIEtKlPE71oEshSlVVR4t9NKV6ntFho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqT4EEMFRzqJ8nOUAmAdYJctdgM9WngRjuZ2xyV9H9BKaALfq4O2qyf7ZSc2g/WKrLh90VKJC3HKSSbGduym54=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ad69:: with SMTP id z38-v6mr11937873edc.306.1525000087768; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.143.195 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABUE3Xnr1O5gn5NrutU0eQSMQX4Wrt=SZcMi8wVSvwrKvbonew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABUE3Xnr1O5gn5NrutU0eQSMQX4Wrt=SZcMi8wVSvwrKvbonew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 14:08:07 +0300
Message-ID: <CABUE3XkB_ZPxA7dXbsJcC0md1HDzfrpa-7LYBnFYpBf0=n+KuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, rtg-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000839116056afac095"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/Wm-OvqjFxwH8Vhw5oKPpzqwjymE>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:08:12 -0000
+ LSR mailing list. Cheers, Tal. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this > draft. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd/ > > The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, > perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication > to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the > draft’s lifetime as a working group document. > > For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir > > Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd.txt > Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi > Review Date: April 2018 > Intended Status: Standards Track > > *Summary:* > This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of > issues and a few nits that should be considered prior to being submitted to > the IESG. > > *Comments:* > > - The Security Considerations should be more detailed. The reference > to RFC 7770 is a good start, but please add more details about potential > attacks. For example, what happens if there is a spoofed MSD with a low MSD > value? What is the impact of such an attack? > - Section 3: > - The description of the Length field says “minimum of 2”, implying > it can be higher than 2. > On the other hand, the Value field: “consists of a 1 octet sub-type > (IANA Registry) and 1 octet value.”, which implies that the Length is equal > to 2. > Please align the two descriptions, i.e., if flexibility for future > sub-types is required, please change the description of Value to allow > longer values. > - The comment applies to Section 4 as well. > > *Nits:* > > - The term “minimum MSD”, which translates to “minimum maximum SID > Depth” should be explained. > - The term “maximum MSD” appears twice in the document, which seems > either redundant, or a typo (did you mean minimum MSD?). > - The acronym SID should be spelled out on its first use. > - The acronyms RI and LSA should be added to the Terminology > subsection. > - Section 1.1.1 and Section 2 are both titled “Terminology”. It would > be best to merge Section 1.1 into Section 2, and avoid the duplicate title. > - “each node/link a given SR path” -> “each node/link of a given SR > path” > - “nodes and links which has been configured” -> “nodes and links that > have been configured” > - “laso”->”also” > - “Other Sub-types other than defined” -> “Sub-types other than > defined” > > > > Cheers, > Tal Mizrahi. >
- [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-ospf-se… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-osp… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-osp… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-osp… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-osp… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Early review: draft-ietf-osp… Tal Mizrahi