IESG agenda for 2009-10-08 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 05 October 2009 10:50 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E043A69B2 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.942, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmOcadd9L8JH for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [206.197.161.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E553A6892 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n95B0gVx008752 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:00:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n95B0gNk008740 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 04:00:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:00:42 -0700
Message-Id: <200910051100.n95B0gNk008740@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-10-08 telechat.
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:12:53 -0700
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:50:16 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-10-08). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date SEC Oct 04 IKEv2 Session Resumption (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Paul Hoffman (paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) is the document shepherd. Token: Pasi Eronen INT Sep 29 Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Vijay Devarapalli (vijay@wichorus.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Jari Arkko OPS Sep 28 SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Vijay Gurbani is the PROTO-shepherd Token: Dan Romascanu Was deferred by Robert Sparks on 2009-09-21 OPS Oct 05 Updated IANA Considerations for Diameter Command Code Allocations (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Victor Fajardo (vfajardo@research.telcordia.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Ron Bonica APP Oct 05 Preliminary Evaluation of RFC 1652 for Advancement to Full Standard (Standard) draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This draft contains the list of changes planned by the YAM WG to move RFC 1652 to Full Standard. There is no intention to publish this document as an RFC, so IESG should vote on this document as if RFC 1652 is advancing to Full Standard. S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> has agreed to serve as the document shepherd, but note that there is no shepherding write-up for this document. Token: Alexey Melnikov RTG Oct 01 Requirements for OAM in MPLS Transport Networks (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd. Note that this document is a requirement document, for reasons that have to do with referencibility by ITU-T we have opted to put it on the standards track. The same decision applies to all MPLS-TP requirement documents. Token: Adrian Farrel RTG Oct 01 MPLS TP Network Management Requirements (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the Document Shepherd. Note that this document is a requirement document. For reasons that have to do with how the ITU-T can reference RFCs we have opted to put it on the Standards Track. Token: Adrian Farrel 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date TSV Sep 25 Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-12 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: IESG: Please read the Document Shepherd Writeup, we need to discuss the "Updates: 793" issue. IPR: * Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure Token: Lars Eggert OPS Sep 24 Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Protocols (BCP) draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ron Bonica 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date RAI Sep 24 Presence Interdomain Scaling Analysis for SIP/SIMPLE (Informational) draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Ben Campbell is document shepherd Token: Robert Sparks Was deferred by Cullen Jennings on 2009-09-24 RAI Oct 03 SPEERMINT Requirements for SIP-based Session Peering (Informational) draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings RAI Oct 03 VoIP SIP Peering Use Cases (Informational) draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Cullen Jennings RTG Sep 24 Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks (Informational) draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: JP Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com) is the document shepherd Token: Adrian Farrel SEC Sep 30 Use of TESLA in the ALC and NORM Protocols (Experimental) draft-ietf-msec-tesla-for-alc-norm-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk RTG Oct 01 A Framework for Loop-free Convergence (Informational) draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG Sep 29 IP Fast Reroute Framework (Informational) draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-framework-12 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon SEC Sep 30 IPv6 Configuration in IKEv2 (Experimental) draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-ipv6-config-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Paul Hoffman (paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) is the document shepherd. Token: Tim Polk APP Sep 26 Displaying Downgraded Messages for Email Address Internationalization (Experimental) draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Harald Alvestrand agreed to shepherd the document Token: Alexey Melnikov 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN Oct 03 EAP Authentication Using Only A Password (Informational) draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley Was deferred by Alexey Melnikov on 2009-09-24 GEN Oct 03 IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation (Informational) draft-iana-ipv4-examples-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date SEC Oct 02 X.509 Key and Signature Encoding for the KeyNote Trust Management System (Informational) draft-keromytis-keynote-x509-02 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 3.3.2 Returning Item Area Date INT Sep 29 Routing and Addressing in Next-Generation EnteRprises (RANGER) (Informational) draft-templin-ranger-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko GEN Sep 24 Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem Statement and Brief Survey (Informational) draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Rajeev Koodli (rajeev.koodli@gmail.com) is the document shepherd. Token: Jari Arkko 3.3.3 For Action Area Date RAI Sep 24 Diversion Indication in SIP (Historic) draft-levy-sip-diversion-10 [txt] Token: Robert Sparks 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date TSV Sep 16 Multipath TCP (mptcp) Token: Magnus 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date TSV Sep 09 Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) Token: Magnus INT Sep 14 Access Node Control Protocol (ancp) Token: Ralph 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Link Relations Request [IANA #259813] (Lisa Dusseault) 6.2 Review of application/3gpp-ims+xml Media Type (Alexey Melnikov) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-10-08 telechat. Bill Fenner