IESG agenda for 2009-05-21 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 18 May 2009 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FC828C250 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67XEmnND-45A for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 03:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BABB3A7028 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 03:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4IB027q031334 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n4IB02s9031333 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:00:02 -0700
Message-Id: <200905181100.n4IB02s9031333@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-05-21 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:58:33 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-05-21). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV May 17 RSVP Extensions for Path-Triggered RSVP Receiver Proxy (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Please read the informational document draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches before this one! IPR: * Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto Token: Magnus Westerlund Was deferred by Cullen Jennings on 2009-05-05 INT May 14 IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-netlmm-pmip6-ipv4-support-12 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko TSV May 18 DCCP Simultaneous-Open Technique to Facilitate NAT/ Middlebox Traversal (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dccp-simul-open-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lars Eggert RTG May 17 MPLS Generic Associated Channel (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-mpls-tp-gach-gal-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: This I-D was last called in MPLS and PWE3 It has been approved by the ITU-T IANA comments have been answered satisfactorily Loa Andersson (loa@pi.nu) is the document shepherd Token: Adrian Farrel 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date SEC May 14 An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item Area Date RAI May 13 H.248/MEGACO Registration Procedures (BCP) draft-groves-megaco-pkgereg-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: IESG - when reviewing this, please consider the topic of if it is alright to register a "public" package when the specification is not publicly available. This came up as an IETF LC comment. Token: Cullen Jennings 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV May 15 Adding Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Capability to TCP's SYN/ACK Packets (Experimental) draft-ietf-tcpm-ecnsyn-09 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lars Eggert SEC May 16 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Service Overview (Informational) draft-ietf-dkim-overview-11 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Pasi Eronen TSV May 17 RSVP Proxy Approaches (Informational) draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Read this before the Protocol document IPR: * Cisco's Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-02.txt Token: Magnus Westerlund Was deferred by Cullen Jennings on 2009-05-05 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date INT May 14 The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) (Informational) draft-templin-seal-23 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Brought back to the agenda because of desired status change (now Inf) Token: Jari Arkko GEN May 13 Unintended Consequence of two NAT deployments with Overlapping Address Space (Informational) draft-ford-behave-top-06 [txt] Token: Russ Housley 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date APP Apr 29 Yet Another Mail (yam) Token: Alexey APP Apr 28 Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (xmpp) Token: Cullen 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Ballot Procedures (Russ Housley) 6.2 Revision 1.9 for ID-Checklist.html (Russ Housley) 6.3 Shepherd names in agendas (Jari Arkko) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-05-21 telechat. Bill Fenner