IESG agenda for 2008-07-03 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 30 June 2008 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E473A685C; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A42E3A685C for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQbncquVgFsm for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135473A68E0 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5UB03lc086669 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5UB03FF086668 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:00:03 -0700
Message-Id: <200806301100.m5UB03FF086668@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2008-07-03 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-07-03). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV Multicast Negative-Acknowledgment (NACK) Building Blocks (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 15 draft-ietf-rmt-bb-norm-revised-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund TSV A Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 15 draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-08.txt Note: Document Shepherd: Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net) Token: Lars Eggert Ethernet Pseudowire (PW) Management INT Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 15 draft-ietf-pwe3-enet-mib-13.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation Service Over INT Packet (CEP) Management Information Base (MIB) Using SMIv2 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 15 draft-ietf-pwe3-cep-mib-12.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley Pseudowire (PW) over MPLS PSN Management INT Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 15 draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mpls-mib-14.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley INT Managed Objects for TDM over Packet Switched Network (PSN) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 15 draft-ietf-pwe3-tdm-mib-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley INT Managed Objects for ATM over Packet Switched Network (PSN) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 15 draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-atm-mib-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley OPS MIB for Fibre-Channel Security Protocols (FC-SP) (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 15 draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-mib-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu Restart Signaling for Intermediate System to RTG Intermediate System (IS-IS) (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc3847bis-00.txt Token: Ross Callon Three-Way Handshake for Intermediate System to RTG Intermediate System (IS-IS) Point-to-Point Adjacencies (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc3373bis-01.txt Token: Ross Callon RTG Domain-wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc2966bis-03.txt Token: Ross Callon RTG IS-IS extensions for Traffic Engineering (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-te-bis-00.txt Token: Ross Callon RTG Dynamic Hostname Exchange Mechanism for IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 13 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc2763bis-00.txt Token: Ross Callon Intermediate System to Intermediate System RTG (IS-IS) Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 14 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc3567bis-01.txt Token: Ross Callon Intermediate System to Intermediate System RTG (IS-IS) Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) (Proposed Standard) - 15 of 15 draft-ietf-isis-rfc4205bis-00.txt Token: Ross Callon 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date Framework and Security Considerations for RAI Sep 1 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)-List Services (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-sipping-uri-services-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date OPS IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters (BCP) - 1 of 1 draft-eastlake-ethernet-iana-considerations-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date RAI ENUM-based Softswitch Requirement (Informational) - 1 of 3 draft-ietf-enum-softswitch-req-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson APP Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 3 SMTP extension for internationalized email address (Experimental) - 2 of 3 draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-12.txt Note: Harald Alvestrand is document shepherd. Internationalized Email Headers (Experimental) draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-11.txt Note: Harald Alvestrand is document shepherd. Token: Chris Newman Internationalized Delivery Status and APP Disposition Notifications (Experimental) - 3 of 3 draft-ietf-eai-dsn-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) P-Refused-URI-List Private-Header (P-Header) (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-hautakorpi-sipping-uri-list-handling-refused-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2.3 For Action Area Date INT Cisco Systems' Private VLANs: Scalable Security in a Multi-Client Environment (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-sanjib-private-vlan-09.txt Note: This is an independent submission, going on telechat for RFC3932 check. Token: Mark Townsley 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date SEC Jun 5 IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme) - 1 of 1 Token: Pasi 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date INT Jun 26 Network-based Localized Mobility Management (netlmm) - 1 of 2 Token: Jari INT Jun 26 IPv6 over Low power WPAN (6lowpan) - 2 of 2 Token: Mark 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Jun 11 Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge (pwe3) - 1 of 1 Token: Mark 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Executive Session: Discussion of Appeal (Russ Housley/Tim Polk) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2008-07-03 telechat. Bill Fenner