IESG agenda for 2005-01-06 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 03 January 2005 12:15 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA22109 for <rtg-dir-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:15:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ClRJz-0002V1-EW for rtg-dir-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:28:27 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ClQy1-0008Ou-LN; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:05:45 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ClQwp-00080W-Uj for rtg-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:04:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA21613 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:04:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-dark.research.att.com ([192.20.225.112] helo=mail-yellow.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ClR8z-0002Kv-4v for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:17:05 -0500
Received: from mango.attlabs.att.com (mango.attlabs.att.com [135.197.128.36]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9F519735F for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 06:50:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mango.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.attlabs.att.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j03C02mm080594 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by mango.attlabs.att.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j03C02Qp080593 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:00:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200501031200.j03C02Qp080593@mango.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ed68cc91cc637fea89623888898579ba
Subject: IESG agenda for 2005-01-06 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b045c2b078f76b9f842d469de8a32de3
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat
(2005-01-06).
Updated 2:25:28 EDT, January 3, 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Signaling Extensions for
RTG G.709 Optical Transport Networks Control (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 5
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Participant in PROTO Team Pilot:
Workgroup Chair Followup of AD Evaluation Comments
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-ietf-proto-ad-comments-pilot-00.txt
Token: Alex Zinin
RTG Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 5
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Recovery Functional Specification (Proposed Standard)
- 2 of 5
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-03.txt
Note: Target Category is PS, not INFO as the doc says
Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for
Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
(Informational)
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-05.txt
Note: Target Category is INFO, not PS as the doc says
Analysis of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching
(GMPLS)-based Recovery Mechanisms (including
Protection and Restoration) (Informational)
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-04.txt
Token: Alex Zinin
Generalize Multiprotocol Label Switching(GMPLS)
RTG User-Network Interface (UNI): Resource ReserVation
Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Support for the
Overlay Model (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 5
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-overlay-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Alex Zinin
SEC Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol
(Proposed Standard) - 4 of 5
draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
APP Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 5 of 5
LDAP:String Representation of Distinguished Names
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 5
draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn-15.txt
LDAP: String Representation of Search Filters
(Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter-09.txt
LDAP: Directory Information Models (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-12.txt
Token: Ted Hardie
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
APP Full-mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail: FFPIM
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6
draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Returning because there aren't enough positive
ballots for approval. All old discusses have been
cleared. NOTE: doc has been updated to -08 from -07
since the document was placed on the agenda.
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
SUB Dec 30 Four-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 6
Protocol extensions for support of
Differentiated-Service-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
(Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6
draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-08.txt
Note: Back on Agenda to see if we can get the
DISCUSSes cleared.
Thomas and Alex ??
Maximum Allocation Bandwidth Constraints Model for
Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
(Experimental)
draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-04.txt
Max Allocation with Reservation Bandwidth Constraint
Model for MPLS/DiffServ TE & Performance Comparisons
(Experimental)
draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-06.txt
Russian Dolls Bandwidth Constraints Model for
Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering
(Experimental)
draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-07.txt
Token: Bert Wijnen
RTG Authentication/Confidentiality for OSPFv3 (Proposed
Standard) - 3 of 6
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-auth-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Participant in PROTO Team pilot:
Working Group Chair Followup of DISCUSS Comments
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-discuss-pilot-01.txt
Token: Bill Fenner
SEC Sep 26 IP Authentication Header (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
SEC Aug 4 Extended Sequence Number Addendum to IPsec DOI for
ISAKMP (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6
draft-ietf-ipsec-esn-addendum-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
SEC Sep 26 IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) (Proposed
Standard) - 6 of 6
draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
INT Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Margaret Wasserman
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
APP Goals for Internet Messaging to Support Diverse
Service Environments (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-lemonade-goals-05.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ted Hardie
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document
represent an end run around the IETF's working groups
or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible
change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other
matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) Version 4 for
IPv4, IPv6 and OSI (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-mills-sntp-v4-00.txt
Note: 2004-11-24: Successful NTP BOF in
Washington DC. This document will be
taken over by the WG. Plan was (IIRC) to publish
this document
essentially as is as an informational (snapshot)
and use the document
as the basis for a Standards Track document on
NTP.
Token: Thomas Narten
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
RTG Dec 8 Path Computation Element (pce) - 1 of
1
Token: Alex
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
RTG Dec 8 Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (manet) - 1 of
1
Token: Alex
5. Agenda Working Group News
6. IAB News We can use
7. Management Issues
- IESG agenda for 2005-01-06 telechat. Bill Fenner