IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RTG-DIR] Sorry I missed that draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement were progressing to IESG review

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 01 February 2016 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13D51A90AB; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:49:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBwMAXjF-ZFa; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D551A90A8; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 05:49:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1396; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454334588; x=1455544188; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FTAQIXVZ75zkkI99IiKe2nP02kl49HPyLBtDBxKAgS4=; b=NsqEVsuilKF5sCfSxpy80iN/sQA28Jn7Y2o6FZBV9cfX2afoPg27sfIR A2pEST6hSj1V3RDRIUmuQ59eOpXLKiG5dGBIrHms5wHYOtk8g5lJCrpZM 3hvs8lXp3O7LyYM+jSNNjwLh5iU/fwl+MxJfulWcwbiMfVe9Yz+3PHdh5 U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ALBQDNYa9W/4gNJK1egzqBPwaIUq9JgiGBY4YPAoEzORMBAQEBAQEBgQqEQgEBBDo0GwIBCDYQMiUCBAESiBu8VwEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBARmGDwGENohsAQSSbIQDAY1KgVuHZ4Uujj0BIQFAggIZHYE0aogBfAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,380,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="69011875"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Feb 2016 13:49:47 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u11DnlLu028389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:49:47 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:49:46 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:49:47 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Sorry I missed that draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement were progressing to IESG review
Thread-Index: AQHRXLd3DPnvk/DJPkOrBzcXPVeyy58XRiEA
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:49:46 +0000
Message-ID: <D2D4CAA7.10BAF4%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <56AEF71A.6070208@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <56AEF71A.6070208@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7F2B93C95F6508449756B5B9CD836EC8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/gWO-bVcjeCjdFOQOOMqb5r_ffMU>
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Sorry I missed that draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement were progressing to IESG review
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 13:49:50 -0000

On 2/1/16, 1:11 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

Loa:

Hi!

>I just saw the DISCUSS from Deborah on draft-ietf-spring-problem-
>statement. This draft slid under mt  radar, sorry I should have been
>more observant.
>
>I find my self a bit split, on one hand I support Segment/Source
>Routing (there are a number of cases where it is beneficial), on the
>other hand I quite agree with what Deborah put in her DISCUSS/COMMENT.
>Especially we need to take care when we talk about other, especially
>IETF, technologies.

Even though the authors haven't replied to Deborah's DISCUSS, I'm sure
they will take that text out.

>I went back to see what we said in the rtg dir review and to my
>surprise found that it was not reviewed by the directorate. I fail to
>see why this is. Shouldn't this important draft  have been through a
>directorate review?

Yes, it probably should have -- that one is on me.

The IETF Last Call happened over the holidays, there had been extensive
discussion on the mailing list, this document is a "process document" (if
I was the only one deciding I wouldn't have published it), etc.  All that
doesn't justify the non-review -- just pointing out what went through my
mind at the moment.

Given the DISCUSSes there's still plenty of time for more review if anyone
who hasn't read this document wants to do it.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email