Fwd: AD-review comments on draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit

Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> Sat, 20 December 2003 02:57 UTC

Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:54:53 -0800
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Reply-To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Message-ID: <4266672154.20031219185453@psg.com>
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Fwd: AD-review comments on draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit
In-Reply-To: <16265296676.20031219183158@psg.com>
References: <16265296676.20031219183158@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: rtg-dir-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-admin@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

fyi
-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin/

This is a forwarded message
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>, Rohit Dube <rohit@utstar.com>
Cc: erosen@cisco.com, ppsenak@cisco.com, padma@juniper.net, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Date: Friday, December 19, 2003, 6:31:58 PM
Subject: AD-review comments on draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit

===8<==============Original message text===============
Hi guys,

See my comments below, pls.
Acee, Rohit, feel free to fwd this to the WG mailing list.

Technical:

 - The "Security Considerations" section needs to be included

 - I assume that the DN bit is set for type-3 and type-5 LSAs
   only. Seems that the document needs to spell this out and
   state how the DN-bit set to 1 in other LSAs should be treated.

While fixing the above, please address the following editorial
comments:

 - Please remove citations from the abstract

 - Please include standard IPR and Copyright sections (see RFC 2026
   for more info)

Thanks

-- 
Alex

===8<===========End of original message text===========

Fwd: AD-review comments on draft-ietf-ospf-2547-d… Alex Zinin