IESG agenda for 2009-04-23 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 20 April 2009 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <fenner@fenron.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0381E3A6814 for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fT0Llj8BuIzQ for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEAA3A68AA for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3KB038j062374 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n3KB03SF062369 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:00:03 -0700
Message-Id: <200904201100.n3KB03SF062369@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2009-04-23 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:58:55 -0000
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2009-04-23). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date OPS Apr 18 RADIUS Design Guidelines (BCP) draft-ietf-radext-design-07 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu OPS Apr 20 Exporting Type Information for IPFIX Information Elements (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ipfix-exporting-type-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu OPS Apr 20 Specification of the IPFIX File Format (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-ipfix-file-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Dan Romascanu OPS Apr 20 Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for Home Agent to Diameter Server Interaction (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split-16 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] IPR: * Nortel Networks Statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split Token: Dan Romascanu INT Apr 19 GRE Key Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-netlmm-grekey-option-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko INT Apr 20 Container Option for Server Configuration (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt-05 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko SEC Apr 20 An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-04 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk GEN Apr 18 Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (Draft) rfc3852 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date RAI Apr 20 Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter (Proposed Standard) draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-23 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Did new LC because previous one did not mention DOWNREF. Token: Cullen Jennings 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date INT Apr 18 Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification (Proposed Standard) draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-06 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] IPR: * Juniper's Statement of IPR related to draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered-06 Token: Jari Arkko 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date RTG Apr 18 OSPFv2 Routing Protocols Extensions for ASON Routing (Experimental) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-ospf-08 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Adrian Farrel INT Apr 20 State Machines for Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) (Informational) draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-10 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date SEC Apr 18 ECC Brainpool Standard Curves and Curve Generation (Informational) draft-lochter-pkix-brainpool-ecc-03 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Note: Reviewing AD is satisfied that no IPR disclosure specific to this draft is needed. (Independent submission, not sponsored!) Token: Tim Polk INT Apr 20 PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics (Informational) draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00 [txt] [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date APP Apr 06 Open Web authentication (oauth) Token: Lisa 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date INT Apr 02 Multiple Interfaces (mif) Token: Jari INT Mar 05 Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp) Token: Jari INT Apr 03 Network-Based Mobility Extensions (netext) Token: Jari 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Liaison Response to ITU-T SG11 REVIEW DRAFT TEXT (Lars Eggert and Magnus Westerlund) 7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2009-04-23 telechat. Bill Fenner