[RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01.txt
Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Mon, 20 January 2014 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7994A1A0258; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gCxBzuLI6C4i; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0252.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.252]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBB31A0254; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail104-db9-R.bigfish.com (10.174.16.230) by DB9EHSOBE031.bigfish.com (10.174.14.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:16 +0000
Received: from mail104-db9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail104-db9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB8E802A1; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -20
X-BigFish: VPS-20(zz103dKc857hdbf2izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzz1033IL17326ah8275dh18c673h1de097h186068h1d68dehz2fh109h2a8h839hd24hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1bceh224fh1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dc1h1de9h1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h20f0h2216h22d0h2336h2461h2487h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail104-db9: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=rcallon@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(41574002)(189002)(199002)(31966008)(15202345003)(87936001)(90146001)(47446002)(4396001)(81686001)(69226001)(76576001)(74876001)(19273905006)(74366001)(93516002)(83072002)(74502001)(81342001)(85852003)(74706001)(80022001)(74662001)(56816005)(86362001)(15975445006)(76482001)(74316001)(87266001)(65816001)(47976001)(85306002)(76786001)(2656002)(66066001)(77982001)(54316002)(83322001)(51856001)(80976001)(53806001)(63696002)(79102001)(47736001)(54356001)(50986001)(49866001)(46102001)(19580395003)(76796001)(92566001)(76176001)(59766001)(56776001)(81542001)(93136001)(33646001)(575784001)(81816001)(24736002)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR05MB636; H:CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.241.14; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail104-db9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail104-db9 (MessageSwitch) id 1390251253441523_31652; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB9EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.16.239]) by mail104-db9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C867380047; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by DB9EHSMHS003.bigfish.com (10.174.14.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:13 +0000
Received: from CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.199.24) by BL2PRD0510HT005.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.395.1; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:11 +0000
Received: from CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.199.24) by CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.199.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.851.15; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:09 +0000
Received: from CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.199.24]) by CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.199.24]) with mapi id 15.00.0851.011; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:09 +0000
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: "rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac8WIcK8h2AG2X6JRH6T7bYg8PNnEw==
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:08 +0000
Message-ID: <da56aac4f129444d926775a97a9aa51f@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-forefront-prvs: 00979FCB3A
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_da56aac4f129444d926775a97a9aa51fCO2PR05MB636namprd05pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis@tools.ietf.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:54:19 -0000
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/routing.html Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc6326bis-01.txt Reviewer: Ross Callon Review Date: January 20, 2014 IETF LC End Date: January 22, 2014 Intended Status: Proposed Standard Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: The document is very well written and is ready for publication. Thanks! Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. Nits: Probably the reference to RFC 5342 should be replaced by a reference to 7042 (which obsoletes 5342).