IESG agenda for 2006-05-25 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 22 May 2006 11:00 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi88r-0001zk-85; Mon, 22 May 2006 07:00:05 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi88q-0001wY-8B for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 07:00:04 -0400
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fi88o-00029x-RL for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 07:00:04 -0400
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (frogbits.attlabs.att.com [135.197.129.124]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D16147B1A for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2006 07:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4MB01hr054459 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2006 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4MB0044054458 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 04:00:00 -0700
Message-Id: <200605221100.k4MB0044054458@frogbits.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 410b68b37343617c6913e76d02180b14
Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-05-25 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2006-05-25).
Updated 2:2:26 EDT, May 22, 2006
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
1.5 Review of Projects
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP
(BCP) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> in sheperd
IETF Last call ends 2006-05-23
Token: Magnus Westerlund
RAI Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2
of 4
RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones
and Telephony Signals (Proposed Standard) -
2 of 4
draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833bis-13.txt
Note: PROTO shepherd Colin Perkins
<csp@csperkins.org>
Definition of Events For Modem, FAX, and
Text Telephony Signals (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-avt-rfc2833bisdata-06.txt
Note: PROTO shepherd
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
Token: Cullen Jennings
TSV Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 3
of 4
DDP/RDMAP Security (Proposed Standard) - 3
of 4
draft-ietf-rddp-security-09.txt
Note: PROTO Sherpherd: David Black
(Black_David@emc.com)
Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access
Protocol (RDMA) and Direct Data Placement
(DDP) (Informational)
draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-06.txt
Note: PROTO Shepherd: David Black
(Black_David@emc.com)
Token: Jon Peterson
Encapsulation Methods for Transport of PPP/
INT HDLC Over MPLS Networks (Proposed Standard)
- 4 of 4
draft-ietf-pwe3-hdlc-ppp-encap-mpls-08.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The
OPS Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation
Plan (BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-grow-rfc1519bis-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Geoff Huston is the proto shepherd
Token: David Kessens
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4,
INT ICMPv6, UDP and TCP Headers (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-fenner-iana-exp-2780-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: 3/20/06: Waiting for -03 version from
Bill Fenner to address discusses.
5/5/06: Waiting for Mark to remove his
Discuss and/or talk to Bill.
16/5/06: Bill submits a new revision,
document placed on next telechat agenda.
Token: Jari Arkko
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
Benchmarking Terminology for Resource
OPS Jan 2 Reservation Capable Routers (Informational) - 1
of 8
draft-ietf-bmwg-benchres-term-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Proto Spepherd: Al Morton
<acmorton@att.com>
Token: David Kessens
RTG PCE Communication Protocol Generic Requirements
(Informational) - 2 of 8
draft-ietf-pce-comm-protocol-gen-reqs-05.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
RTG Requirements for Path Computation Element (PCE)
Discovery (Informational) - 3 of 8
draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control
TSV (TFMCC): Protocol Specification (Experimental)
- 4 of 8
draft-ietf-rmt-bb-tfmcc-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: PROTO shepherd: lorenzo vicisano
lorenzo@cisco.com
IETF last call ends 24th of May
Token: Magnus Westerlund
Terminology for Benchmarking Network-layer
OPS Traffic Control Mechanisms (Informational) - 5
of 8
draft-ietf-bmwg-dsmterm-12.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> is the proto
shepherd
Token: David Kessens
OPS IPv6 Transition/Co-existence Security
Considerations (Informational) - 6 of 8
draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-04.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO-SHEPHERDING WG chairs: Kurt Erik
Lindqvist, kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
Token: David Kessens
OPS ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband
Access Networks (Informational) - 7 of 8
draft-ietf-v6ops-bb-deployment-scenarios-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: SHEPHERDING WG chair: Kurt Erik
Lindqvist, kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
Token: David Kessens
OPS IPv6 Network Architecture Protection
(Informational) - 8 of 8
draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO-SHEPHERDING WG chair: Kurt Erik
Lindqvist, kurtis@kurtis.pp.se
Token: David Kessens
3.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
INT Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than 1492 in
PPPoE (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-arberg-pppoe-mtu-gt1492-03.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the
GEN Internet Engineering Task Force
(Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-hoffman-taobis-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Brian Carpenter
SEC IKEv2 Clarifications and Implementation
Guidelines (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-eronen-ipsec-ikev2-clarifications-09.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
Area Date
Experimental Procedure for Long Term
GEN Suspensions from Mailing Lists (Experimental)
- 1 of 1
draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-03.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Last call ended March 15
Token: Brian Carpenter
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
Area Date
GEN Server/Application State Protocol v1
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-bivens-sasp-03.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
Area Date
INT Apr 19 IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks (16ng)
- 1 of 1
Token: Jari
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2006-05-25 telechat. Bill Fenner