IESG agenda for 2004-12-16 telechat.
fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 13 December 2004 12:05 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27776 for <rtg-dir-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:05:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cdp5J-0003MT-Dn for rtg-dir-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:13:49 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CdowW-0004h8-IJ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:04:44 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cdosn-0003jJ-Sn for rtg-dir@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:00:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27454 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:00:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110] helo=mail-white.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cdp0X-0003F3-Jd for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:08:58 -0500
Received: from mango.attlabs.att.com (mango.attlabs.att.com [135.197.128.36]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6598CA7B00 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:00:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mango.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.attlabs.att.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBDC0Hmm003736 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by mango.attlabs.att.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iBDC0HcX003735 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:00:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:00:17 -0800
Message-Id: <200412131200.iBDC0HcX003735@mango.attlabs.att.com>
From: fenner@research.att.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b7d60495f1a7f2e853e8cbae7e6dbfc
Subject: IESG agenda for 2004-12-16 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ccfb4541e989aa743998098cd315d0fd
IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2004-12-16). Updated 2:25:51 EDT, December 13, 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV RTP payload Format for H.264 Video (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-h264-11.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Last Call and ietf-types review ending day before telechat. Token: Allison Mankin A Negative Acknowledgement Mechanism for TSV Signaling Compression (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-nack-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Last Call ending shortly before tlechat Token: Allison Mankin 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT Transmission of IP over InfiniBand (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-ipoib-ip-over-infiniband-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: On agenda to check if Ted's, David's and Thomas' issues have been addressed. Token: Margaret Wasserman 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date SEC Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-hoffman-ikev1-algorithms-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley SEC Using CMS to Protect Firmware Packages (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-housley-cms-fw-wrap-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman 2.2.2 Returning Item Area Date APP A UUID URN Namespace (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-mealling-uuid-urn-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date SUB Framework for GMPLS-based Control of SDH/SONET Networks (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-04.txt Note: Participant in PROTO Team pilot: Workgroup Chair Followup of AD Evaluation Comments http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ draft-ietf-proto-ad-comments-pilot-00.txt Token: Alex Zinin IAB and IESG Recommendation for IETF GEN Administrative Restructuring (Informational) - 2 of 2 draft-iab-iesg-adminrest-rec-00.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Harald Alvestrand 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date APP The 'tag' URI scheme (Informational) - 1 of 3 draft-kindberg-tag-uri-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie The 'info' URI Scheme for Information Assets with APP Identifiers in Public Namespaces (Informational) - 2 of 3 draft-vandesompel-info-uri-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie APP Synchronization operations for disconnected IMAP4 clients (Informational) - 3 of 3 draft-melnikov-imap-disc-06.txt Token: Ted Hardie 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document represent an end run around the IETF's working groups or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date RTG Dec 8 Path Computation Element (pce) - 1 of 1 Token: Alex 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date OPS Dec 9 IPv6 Operations (v6ops) - 1 of 2 Token: David RTG Dec 8 Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (manet) - 2 of 2 Token: Alex 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. Agenda Working Group News 6. IAB News We can use 7. Management Issues
- IESG agenda for 2004-12-16 telechat. Bill Fenner