IESG agenda for 2008-12-11 telechat.
fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) Mon, 08 December 2008 12:00 UTC
Return-Path: <rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798043A6782; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A613A690E for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxowEnS99-OL for <rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15583A6782 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mB8C04Qf085032 for <rtg-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com)
Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mB8C04wD085031 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:00:04 -0800
Message-Id: <200812081200.mB8C04wD085031@runaway.fenron.com>
From: fenner@fenron.com
To: rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: IESG agenda for 2008-12-11 telechat.
X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Directorate <rtg-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/rtg-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-dir>, <mailto:rtg-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org
IESG Agenda
Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next
Telechat (2008-12-11).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Administrivia
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Bash the Agenda
1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat
1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
Area Date
TSV Basic Forward Error Correction (FEC) Schemes
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Magnus Westerlund
TSV RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification
Version 2 (Draft Standard) - 2 of 11
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Spencer Shepler
(spencer.shepler@gmail.com)
Token: Lars Eggert
RAI Associating Time-codes with RTP streams (Proposed
Standard) - 3 of 11
draft-ietf-avt-smpte-rtp-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Tom Taylor is the PROTO Shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
APP IMAP4 extension for named searches (filters)
(Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11
draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-07.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Dave Cridland is document shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
RTG IS-IS Generic Cryptographic Authentication
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
SEC Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message
Syntax (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11
draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
Preserving Topology Confidentiality in
RTG Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Key-Based
Mechanism (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11
draft-ietf-pce-path-key-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
INT Mobile IPv6 Support for Dual Stack Hosts and
Routers (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
Forward RTO-Recovery (F-RTO): An Algorithm for
TSV Detecting Spurious Retransmission Timeouts with
TCP (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11
draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Wesley Eddy (wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov) (TCPM
co-chair) is the shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
INT DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery (Proposed Standard) - 10 of
11
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery-05.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
RAI RTP Payload format for G.719 (Proposed Standard) -
11 of 11
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Cullen Jennings
2.1.2 Returning Item
Area Date
TSV GIST: General Internet Signalling Transport
(Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-17.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: RE-evaluate your ABSTAIN positions. All that
stays in ABSTAIN please indicate in the comment
field that you have performed this re-evaluation
and also include some motivation behind your
decision.
Token: Magnus Westerlund
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
Area Date
APP IMAP METADATA Extension (Proposed
Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-16.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov is document
shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
Area Date
LEMONADE Architecture - Supporting Open
APP Mobile Alliance (OMA) Mobile Email (MEM)
using Internet Mail (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-ietf-lemonade-architecture-04.txt [Open
Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov is document shepherd.
Token: Chris Newman
RTG An Analysis of Scaling Issues in MPLS-TE Core
Networks (Informational) - 2 of 3
draft-ietf-mpls-te-scaling-analysis-04.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
RTG The RPF Vector TLV (Informational) - 3 of 3
draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-06.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: David Ward
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
Area Date
GEN MIKEY General Extension Payload for OMA
BCAST 1.0 (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-jerichow-msec-mikey-genext-oma-00.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
SEC Digital Signatures on Internet-Draft
Documents (Informational) - 2 of 3
draft-housley-internet-draft-sig-file-06.txt
[Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell
SEC Transport Layer Protocol (Informational) - 3
of 3
draft-igoe-secsh-aes-gcm-00.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.
The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot
positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.
Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments
will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.
3.3.1 New Item
Area Date
APP DNS Blacklists and Whitelists
(Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt [Open Web
Ballot]
Note: Propose to respond "1. The IESG has
not found any conflict between this document
and IETF work."
Token: Lisa Dusseault
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE
4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
NONE
5. IAB News We Can Use
6. Management Issues
6.1 Executive session: Appeal of DNSOP WG Decision of September 13,
2008 (Lisa Dusseault)
6.2 Expedite draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719 (Cullen Jennings)
6.3 Sipping Service URN (Cullen Jennings)
7. Working Group News
- IESG agenda for 2008-12-11 telechat. Bill Fenner